Ask A Question About Eschatology
If you would like to ask a question about Reformed amillennialism, ask it here.
If the question is relevant to readers of the Riddleblog, or has not already been answered, I'll get to it when I can. I try to answer one of these a week, so, obviously, I cannot get to all of them.
Please be sure to read through previously answered questions first. I may have already tackled it!
Questions and answers are archived in the "Answers to Questions About Eschatology" section.
My question may sound crazy, cooky, or a perhaps odd. But I was wondering if the following could be a possibility. Satan was bound at the Cross of Christ, and his binding specifically refers to his deception of the nations. DP's see the millennium as a literal 1000 years. Could it possibly be that Satan was bound a literal 1000 years? Or that he has been released already? I ask this because there seems to be so much deception. For example, I look at the rise of Islam. Or all the strange (false) teachings that came out in the 1800's (humanism, marxism, darwinism, etc.), and I see a lot of deception going on, and it seems to be growing. So could Satan now, currently, be unbound and once again deceiving the nations? Thank you for any answer/clarity you can give.
Bill
https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/not-two-kingdoms-but-two-ages?utm_content=buffer1474f&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer
Molinism came up in an discussion. I can see its implications within eschatology. Do you have any resources discussing Molinism in relation to the Reformed position? I have searched but haven't found any reputable resources. Thanks!
JA
have you ever considered specifically refuting the Local Church (of Witness Lee and Watchman Nee) eschatology?
They believe in Partial Rapture and Millennial/Kingdom Exclusion. This last one affirms that carnal Christians will be cast into outer darkness for a literal 1000 years do be chastised (disciplined) by God. They also believe the Bema seat of Christ will be punitive.
With my limited knowledge in eschatology, I wrote a refutation to a few elements of the Local Church eschatology. You may read it here:
https://pt.scribd.com/doc/262114578/Partial-Rapture-and-Dispensational-Punishment-Nathan-Caze
Thanks
At the 6th trumpet blast, Rev 9:20 states "The rest of mankind, who were not killed by these plagues, did not repent...". How does this statement apply to Christians since they are present during this time?
Thanks for your time,
Peter Tobgui.
I have been drifting towards amillenialism for the last couple of years from a dispensational premillenial background. I love the clarity that it brings to prophecy, but I am having a hard time understanding Zechariah 14 from an amillenial perspective. The chapter fits so nicely into the premil scheme! Any thoughts you could offer on this would be appreciated, or if it's too much time to explain, maybe a commentary suggestion?
Thank you.
I'm listening to a series you did that was published on Monergism. The series is 28 audio sessions on the topic of Amillennialism. At the end of session #7, "The Basic Eschatology of the NT" a woman asked you what do we do now that dispensationalism is not correct? You basically answered that we should long for the Lord's return and get back to proclaiming "maranatha" and yearn for Him to return. I've been focused for somes years on a couple portions of the Scriptures. One from Habakkuk and the other from 2 Peter 3. In Habakkuk 2 we are encouraged to wait for the "vision". Hab 2:3 For still the vision awaits its appointed time; it hastens to the end—it will not lie. If it seems slow, wait for it; it will surely come; it will not delay.
Notice the word "hastens"?
In 2 Peter 3:12 we see the word "hastening".
2Pe 3:12 waiting for and hastening the coming of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be set on fire and dissolved, and the heavenly bodies will melt as they burn!
My point in dropping a line to you is to make clear what I believe the True Church should be doing these days while we "wait" "waiting" for and HASTENING or speeding up, quickening or hurrying up the RETURN OF THE LORD.
When you look at Revelation 8 you see the introduction of the 8th Angel. What's his job? His job is to mix the prayers of the Saints with the fire of the altar then things on earth change because after the mixing the prayers of the Saints with the fire of the altar the seven angels with the seven trumpets prepare to blow::::>
Rev 8:3 And another angel came and stood at the altar with a golden censer, and he was given much incense to offer with the prayers of all the saints on the golden altar before the throne,
Rev 8:4 and the smoke of the incense, with the prayers of the saints, rose before God from the hand of the angel.
Rev 8:5 Then the angel took the censer and filled it with fire from the altar and threw it on the earth, and there were peals of thunder, rumblings, flashes of lightning, and an earthquake.
Rev 8:6 Now the seven angels who had the seven trumpets prepared to blow them.
Wouldn't it be wise then therefore when a lady asks "what should we do sighing and yearning the Lord's return", maranatha, to encourage us to pray earnestly for the Lord to attack our enemies and cast them down to the earth to be trampled under foot of the Church?:::>
Joh 12:28 Father, glorify your name." Then a voice came from heaven: "I have glorified it, and I will glorify it again."
Joh 12:29 The crowd that stood there and heard it said that it had thundered. Others said, "An angel has spoken to him."
Joh 12:30 Jesus answered, "This voice has come for your sake, not mine.
Joh 12:31 Now is the judgment of this world; now will the ruler of this world be cast out.
Joh 12:32 And I, when I am lifted up from the earth, will draw all people to myself."
And
Rom 16:20 The God of peace will soon crush Satan under your feet. The grace of our Lord Jesus Christ be with you.
Just some thoughts that came to me after listening to your answer to the woman's question, what shall we do now?
Perhaps we can only trust that spiritual things are spiritually discerned (2 Cor. 2:14, Gal. 1:12, John 14:26), knowing that God will reveal in due time and as he pleases.
I've listened to part of your Amillennialism 101 course, which I have thoroughly enjoyed and gained a tremendous amount of insight from.
While I probably have quite a few questions, I'll simply ask one. In the amillennial view, the binding of Satan, which I know you have said is the big problem of the view, occurred at the first advent. So, in essence, the Kingdom of God and the proclamation of the gospel restrain Satan until the end. I think many of the texts you use to reinforce that position do the job rather well. My question is, if Satan is bound now and has been for roughly the past 2,000 years, what did the havoc of Satan's "freedom" look like prior to the inauguration of the Kingdom when Jesus stepped onto the scene.
I hope my question makes sense and that it isn't one that you've already answered elsewhere. I've looked around your blog a little bit, and figured I'd simply ask.
Thanks for your ministry as well, brother.
JOHN MACARTHUR: “IT’S OK IF YOU TAKE THE MARK OF THE BEAST.”
http://watch.pair.com/macarthur-mob.mp4
http://www.gty.org/resources/print/sermons/1301-I
If Christ Jesus is reigning on Earth, why pray the Lord's prayer, "Thy Kingdom come on earth as it is in heaven?"
I wonder could you recommend any material refuting the dispensational view that a 3rd Temple will be built in Jerusalem at a future date? Thank you
I am in posession of a fine book, just recently expanded and published by BakerBooks.
To clarify my understanding , the spirit of antichrist is where an individual or organization take on the prerogatives of God and enforce their view using their power and authority. This has happened from the days of Babalon, through the roman period, through the Pope (as stated in WCF) and right down to today, such as the case of the photographer case in New Mexico. Eventually the climax will be the appearance of the individual Antichrist. and then the final judgement.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/08/22/us-usa-marriage-newmexico-idUSBRE97L18J20130822
have I got it right?
many thanks
I have a strange question dealing with how we are to view the two kingdoms in view of eschatology. I have many postmil friends who act like I cant have a view to the gospel transforming a society because I am not postmil and any attempt at me doing this is inconsistent. I do believe that the gospel in some ways transforms a society in that when people are born again they turn from sin, have the Spirit living in them and walk in a different way. When that happens to a majority of people in a society in part that society changes, even if only for a while (Nineveh comes to mind who became wicked again, i think 100 years or so after Jonah?) However, as Christ doesn't return to a saved world this age will never become perfect utopia. We don't strive to change society in any other way but by the gospel of Jesus Christ in the hopes it will regenerate men and restrain sin. Is this view one that you would say IS inconstant with a reformed view of amillennialism
If not, do you have any comments that would help me in dealing with my postmil friends?
If so, can you point to me where I go wrong in the view of two kingdom theology and reformed amillennialism? (im thinking the way Calvin so masterfully described it). They would say that two kingdom theology is part of the reason we are in such a mess (where I would say its the heart of man who unregenerate hates Gods laws and forms laws in opposition to God such as abortion)
Thank you.
If the thousand years is the church age then why does the church age end and satan released for a little while?
Does this mean that people cannot be saved for the brief time when satan is released since it is the end of the church age?
Also revelation states that satan used to Deceive the nations. If the church has been in Existence from the beginning of time why has satan not been bound forever and not just in the interadvental period?
One more...you stated that believers rule with Christ till he returns but this cannot be since the thousand years ends for a brief time.
Are the ruling saints just limited to the martyred?
These questions were brought to me by a premillennialism friend