Social Network Links
Powered by Squarespace
Search the Riddleblog
"Amillennialism 101" -- Audio and On-Line Resources
« Here's Your Big Chance . . . | Main | Bad Karma! »
Monday
Apr232007

Who Said That?

question mark.jpgWho said that?

Our faith, from our ancestors, which we have learned also from you, is this.  We know one God--alone unbegotten; alone everlasting, alone without beginning, alone true, alone possessing immortality, alone wise, alone good, alone master, judge of all, manager, director, immutable and unchangeable, just and good, God of Law, Prophets and New Testament--who begat an only begotten Son before eternal times, through whom he made the ages and everything."

Leave your guess in the comments section below!  No google searches! 

Reader Comments (29)

Joseph Smith
April 23, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterAndrew Alvarez
Eugene Peterson
April 23, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterTyler
'alone possessing immorality'

Really?
April 23, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterMLR
i wondered the same thing...bet it meant to read "immortality."

zrim
April 23, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterzrim
Hmmm. When did they start calling it "New Testament"?

No clue.
April 23, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter"lee n. field"
Sounds like Arius, but I am unsure.
April 23, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterR.K. Brumbelow
I agree with Andrew; it smells like Joseph Smith...
April 23, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterRon
Wouldn't Joseph Smith mentioned that God was once like us, rather than him being unbegotten. I think that this is an older quote.
April 23, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Cerny
I thought it sounded like a creed.
April 23, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterRay
Charles Taze Russell
April 23, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterCharles
I second that.
April 23, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterturmeric
Whoever it is, the only God he's talking about doesn't include the Son, or apparently the Spirit. God is alone without beginning, and hasn't been begotten, but he did beget a Son. So apparently the Son must then have a beginning.

So this must be someone with a low view of Christ. This must be someone who thought of the Son of God as the Greeks used to think of Achilles as the son of a goddess, or Heracles (or Hercules for you Latin types) the son of Hera.

Apparently this person thinks very low of Christ, but then gets confused saying that Christ was begotten before eternal times.

So he starts with a low view of Christ, but then qualifies that, as if to say, "But I don't have a low view of Christ, he was from the beginning and is our Creator."

This is someone who is a little confused on the nature of the Trinity, or at least lacks a little care in how they phrase things.

At best you can say that this statement is theologically sloppy, at worst you can say it's out and out heretical. Is Jesus God or not? This quote doesn't really make that clear.

What on earth is "before eternal times" supposed to mean? What would eternal time be? Is there a special time in which Christ begins, but the universe had not yet begun? It seems like this person thinks that Christ was just created before the universe was. Christ was sort of a super-special angel. He is God's second in command, but he is not himself God, because there's only ONE God, and he is not begotten.

This person doesn't seem to distinguish God in his essence from God in his Three Persons. He knows of no God the Father, but only of God in himself, which the Son and apparently the Spirit are not cosubstantial with.

We believe Christ is eternally begotten, and who has no beginning. He is not created, he is God. God the Father, God the Son and God the Spirit are the One True God. God subsists in Three Persons, but we don't worship three gods. We worship one God.

This person doesn't get that. Maybe he's just wrestling with it or whatever, but he doesn't seem to believe in the Creed, or at least doesn't understand it well enough to reflect it in his thinking.

Let's give him a good flogging and be done with it.

Echo_ohcE
April 23, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterEcho_ohcE
Joseph Smith
April 24, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterBrian
echo,

don't be so platonic(!)...c'mon, name a name! :)

zrim
April 24, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterzrim
I think it sounds like one of the early Church fathers. They were swerving between orthodoxy and gnosticism a lot, as I recall.
April 24, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterRobin
Sounds like Mary Baker Patterson Glover Eddy... but it's too coherent!
April 24, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterTimothy
Ellen White?
April 24, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJeremy
Mitt Romney!!!
April 24, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJeremy
A church father. Clement? Origen?
April 24, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterreg
Joseph Smith, Irenaeus or Origen
April 24, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterscottie f.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.