Who Said That?

Who Said That?

"Last Day and return of Christ sometime on or between:  September 14, 1994:  Beginning of 1994 Jubilee Year, and September 27, 1994:  Last Day of the Feast of Tabernacles."

OK, this is an easy one.  Leave your guesses in the comments section below. Please no google searches.  You must guess! 

Update on Monday, February 12, 2007 at 11:01AM by Kim Riddlebarger

Well, nearly thirteen years have gone by, and he's still dead wrong.  These words come from Harold Camping's 1994 (531).  Its bad enough when the dispensationalists set dates.  It is that much worse when a professing Reformed Christian does it!

Comments

[Chris Allen]

I would be guessing that it is Harold Camping but I'd rather use the "Phone a Friend" option. What do you think Rexella??
:-)

[School of the Solitary Place]

Sorry to sound repetitious but that has to be Harold Camping. 1994 was his banner year.

If what I've read on the Internet is correct (I already knew the answer, I read the Net to find out what he's doing now), Camping has not admitted that the 1994 prophecies were in error. He's apparently gone as far as declaring the church age to be over and that Christ will return in 2011.

I didn't know about the 2011 prophecy until tonight. However, I do remember all the other stuff. What arrogance on the part of this man. He makes a false prophecy and then tries to make the church seem at fault.

It reminds me of an old Road Runner cartoon where Wiley Coyote has the Road Runner out on a ledge and manages to blow up the connection between the ledge and the mountain that he's standing on. Of course, Wiley and the entire mountain topple over while the Road Runner stays on the cliff, still floating on air, then running safely off. Yikes.

Could you imagine this attitude in the judgment? "Well, God, you messed this all up. Good thing you had me on Earth to keep it all straight."

(Lord have mercy)

Walt H

[Echo_ohcE]

Walt,

That makes me think of Terminator 3. "We didn't stop judgment day from coming, we just delayed it a few years."

hahahahahahaha...

Echo

[johannes coetzee]

Praise Almighty God for the one true evelrlasting gospel that goes out into the whole world by means of the radio broadcasts of Family Radio. I live in South Africa and listen to their radio braodcasts almost every night...!

May the Lord richly bless Family Radio till He comes...!

At last we as christians have one worldwide voice proclaiming the whole council of God.

john3;30 Hy moet meer word, maar ek minder

johannes coetzee
Nelspruit
South Africa
cellphone no 0834413474

[Michael]

The good news is that Jesus Christ will indeed return to Earth on October 20, 2011. The bad news is that he'll be staying in Utah.

[Robert T. Bobar]

Harold Camping understanding is total out of context comparing scripture with scripture original meant compare spiritual meaning to words taught by the Spirit. This out of context reading causes him to view everything as synonym: law, covenant, et c. He does not recognize that Bible is a book of scrolls insisting that the wrong translation for Greek word scroll is word book which not invent until in around 1439. Harold Camping always flirts with the unpardonable sin with a Blasphemy against The Holy Spirit by claiming that The Holy Spirit spoke through a donkey to Balaam. But this idea that every sentence must be from The Holy Spirit would cause someone to claim that the words of Satan in the Bible are also by the Holy Spirit; this clearly the unpardonable sin. But most of all Harold Camping lies in saying that only goes by the Bible; he also goes by council of Chalcedon. But all who believe in Hypostatic Union are antichrists the Bible teaches this (John 4: 1-3). The Hypostastic Union crowd do not believe that Jesus came in the flesh they are using the word incarnation incorrectly to mean inpsychation since they believe that the Messiah came into a man (i.e. a human soul) and NOT in the flesh; compare how Pual understood the phase “in the flesh” (Philipians 1: 19-30 You will not find any mysterious union in his understanding of the phase “in the flesh”.). From the beginning Satan has misleadingly implied to Eve that she would be like God. And Moses warded Isreal repeatedly NOT to Warship other gods even placing into the Ten Commandments that He is Jealous God as a warning. Logically you should not come to an opinion which would make the charges that had lead to Jesus’s crucifixion out to be true, you should not come to opinion which would resemble the deification of the Roman Emperors nor should you come to agree with the Greek Philosophers who disputed Paul over the idea that flesh was inferior. And one last point just ground logic, it would make no sense for salvation to be by the crucifixion and resurrection if a human could be saved by his own works (Galatian 3: 21) since they claim that Jesus is human but the biblical view “not from a man nor through a man, but through Jesus Christ” (Galatian 1: 1). As for the word tempted this Greek word is tested and it’s used also of The Father as well. Many have taught that the title “Son of man” is a claim to being human but if you look in context “What if you should see The Son of man ascend to where he was at first.” (John 6: 62) within context of the same scroll “the first “is a reference to the prolog of this scroll (John 1: 2). It should not seem odd to you that God would give himself a title like this since He had mad man after his own image and likeness sort of like making man according to His own blue-print. Let me ask you something, do you want to study the bible only to end up in hell? Because if you believe in Hypostatic Union that is where you’re going, the letter of John is so clear that Antichrists are to be hated that you could not even greet them.

[Robert T. Bobar]

Harold Camping understanding is total out of context comparing scripture with scripture original meant compare spiritual meaning to words taught by the Spirit. This out of context reading causes him to view everything as synonym: law, covenant, et c. He does not recognize that Bible is a book of scrolls insisting that the wrong translation for Greek word scroll is word book which not invent until in around 1439. Harold Camping always flirts with the unpardonable sin with a Blasphemy against The Holy Spirit by claiming that The Holy Spirit spoke through a donkey to Balaam. But this idea that every sentence must be from The Holy Spirit would cause someone to claim that the words of Satan in the Bible are also by the Holy Spirit; this clearly the unpardonable sin. But most of all Harold Camping lies in saying that only goes by the Bible; he also goes by council of Chalcedon. But all who believe in Hypostatic Union are antichrists the Bible teaches this (John 4: 1-3). The Hypostastic Union crowd do not believe that Jesus came in the flesh they are using the word incarnation incorrectly to mean inpsychation since they believe that the Messiah came into a man (i.e. a human soul) and NOT in the flesh; compare how Pual understood the phase “in the flesh” (Philipians 1: 19-30 You will not find any mysterious union in his understanding of the phase “in the flesh”.). From the beginning Satan has misleadingly implied to Eve that she would be like God. And Moses warded Isreal repeatedly NOT to Warship other gods even placing into the Ten Commandments that He is Jealous God as a warning. Logically you should not come to an opinion which would make the charges that had lead to Jesus’s crucifixion out to be true, you should not come to opinion which would resemble the deification of the Roman Emperors nor should you come to agree with the Greek Philosophers who disputed Paul over the idea that flesh was inferior. And one last point just ground logic, it would make no sense for salvation to be by the crucifixion and resurrection if a human could be saved by his own works (Galatian 3: 21) since they claim that Jesus is human but the biblical view “not from a man nor through a man, but through Jesus Christ” (Galatian 1: 1). As for the word tempted this Greek word is tested and it’s used also of The Father as well. Many have taught that the title “Son of man” is a claim to being human but if you look in context “What if you should see The Son of man ascend to where he was at first.” (John 6: 62) within context of the same scroll “the first “is a reference to the prolog of this scroll (John 1: 2). It should not seem odd to you that God would give himself a title like this since He had mad man after his own image and likeness sort of like making man according to His own blue-print. Let me ask you something, do you want to study the bible only to end up in hell? Because if you believe in Hypostatic Union that is where you’re going, the letter of John is so clear that Antichrists are to be hated that you could not even greet them.