Social Network Links
Powered by Squarespace
Search the Riddleblog
"Amillennialism 101" -- Audio and On-Line Resources
« What Books Did It for You? | Main | The Latest from Barna -- No Surprises »
Sunday
May272007

Who Said That?

question%20mark.jpgWho Said That?

"Judaism has some advantages over Christianity in that, for example, it does not proselytise—except among Jews—and it does not make the cretinous mistake of saying that the Messiah has already made his appearance. … However, along with Islam and Christianity, it does insist that some turgid and contradictory and sometimes evil and mad texts, obviously written by fairly unexceptional humans, are in fact the word of god. I think that the indispensable condition of any intellectual liberty is the realisation that there is no such thing."

OK, leave your guesses in the comments section below.  No google searches or cheating! 

Reader Comments (15)

Russell?
May 28, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterkeith
Wow, clearly a hater of God, not even trying to suggest he is neutral.
Therefore an atheist who is hostile openly.

Thomas Paine?
Russell is a good guess too
Richard Dawkins?
May 28, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterIvan
Christopher Hitchens?
May 28, 2007 | Unregistered Commenter"lee n. field"
Daniel Dennett?
May 28, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJohn Dunne
Clearly a Brit. He spells "realization" with an "s." Also clearly a hard core atheist....Seems philosphically inclined, couching his opinion as a defense of "intellectual liberty".....my guess....Russell.
May 28, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterreg
My guess would also be Dawkins, although it could be intellectual lightweight Sam Harris, or ossibly one of Harris' mind numbed disciples, Brian Flemming.
May 28, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterPaul C. Quillman
Sam Harris certainly gets my vote.
May 28, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJohnny T. Helms
Bertrand Russel I think is the best guess.

But I'd like to offer another guess: the Pope. Ok, he didn't say it, but he might as well.
May 28, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterEcho_ohcE

HA! This person also said:

If you examine the record of the so-called anti-war movement in this country and imagine what would have happened had its counsel been listened to over the last 15 and more years, you would have a world in which the following would be the case:

Saddam Hussein would be the owner and occupier of Kuwait, he would have succeeded in the annexation, not merely the invasion, but the abolition of an Arab and Muslim state that was a member of the Arab League and of the United Nations. And with these resources, as we now know because he lost that war, he was attempting to equip himself with the most terrifying arsenal that it was possible for him to lay his hands on. That's one consequence of anti-war politics, that's what would have happened.

In the meanwhile, Slobodan Milošević would have made Bosnia part of a greater Serbia, and Kosovo would have been ethnically cleansed and also annexed. The Taliban would be still in power in Afghanistan if the anti-war movement had been listened to, and al-Qaeda would still be their guests. And Saddam Hussein, with his crime family, would still be privately holding ownership over a terrorized people in a state that's been most aptly described as a concentration camp above ground and a mass grave underneath it.

Now if I had that record politically, I would be extremely modest, I wouldn't be demanding explanations from those of us who said it's about time that we stop this continual capitulation to dictatorship, to racism, to aggression and to totalitarian ideology. That we will not allow to be appeased in Iraq, the failures in Rwanda, and in Bosnia, and in Afghanistan, and elsewhere. And we take pride in having taken that position, and we take pride in our Iraqi and Kurdish friends who are conducting this struggle, on our behalves I should say.
May 28, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterEcho_ohcE
Christopher Hitchens.
May 29, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterArt
Richard Dawkins is my guess.
May 29, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterjohnny_redeemed
Sounds like the mentality of just about every other American online who engages in debates on news/politics forums.....
May 29, 2007 | Unregistered Commentercarolyn
Given how Christopher Hitchens has been in the press a lot lately, I'll vote for him. Plus the additional quote posted by Echo seems consistent with what I've heard from Hitchens ...
May 29, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterMark
I would guess it is that scholar at Union Theological Seminary that said no archaeological discovery ever contradicted the bible.
May 29, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterPedro
The anti-war quote above sounds like it could have been Tony Blair.

Slightly offtopic: My wife had an interesting observation about the doctrinal statement of ETS. Apparantly, even Satan could join the organization in good conscience (so to speak).
May 30, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterAndrew Alvarez

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.