One Reason Why I'd Like to See the Seventeenth Amendment Repealed
Aside from my personal opinions about Senator Barbara Boxer (now known as Ma'am), there is a point behind this post. The video speaks for itself. How does this woman get re-elected over and over again?
As for my point . . . US Senators were supposed to represent the interests of their state in all business regarding the federal government. The members of the House of Representatives were to represent the interests of the citizens within their various districts before the federal government.
But once the seventeenth amendment was ratified in 1913, US Senators were effectively removed from their state legislatures, now to reside full-time in DC. In practice, US Senators no longer represent their states, but their political parties. This re-structuring of the constitution has helped to create the kind of pomposity we see coming from Ma'am Boxer in this video. Senators no longer see themselves as public servants, but as an elite governing class, above the rabble . . . Sadly, this kind of condescending attitude coming from Ma'am Boxer toward a decorated brigadier general, is typical of virtually all senators from either party.
One way to put an end to this would be to return these people to their state legislatures (for six months of the year) and force them to represent the interest of their states, not their political parties. If you want a smaller, more responsive federal government, one place to start is with the repeal of the seventeenth amendment!
Here's a great discussion on the reasons why the seventeenth amendment was passed, and the ramifications and benefits of repealing it. Let's do it!
http://www.liberty-ca.org/repeal17/states/montana2003oneil.htm
Reader Comments (19)
You are, of course, correct about the 17th. Let me please add the 16th to your list as well.
Imagine with me the scenario where each American taxpayer received a bill, as they did prior to 1913, for their proportional share of the spending now going on in Congress! If people had to actually pay their $55,000 share of TARP one can only imagine how quickly it would be rescinded! And how many more people would actually vote!
To come back to your point, that level of accountability and increased voter turnout would of course, curtail the likes of Her Imperial Highness.
Best wishes,
The reporter forgot that she was supposed to be reporting the news. Instead she got upset because the person that she was interviewing was not worshipping Obama clown, as she and the other Journo's do.
Just about everything Ma'am Boxer says should be used against her.
I love this quote by her,
"Those who survived the San Francisco earthquake said, "Thank God, I'm still alive." But, of course, those who died, their lives will never be the same again.
Weird, I thought Miranda applied only to law-breakers, like Blago and Kilpatrick, not those with different politics. You're PC slip is showing.
But I love blunders. Speaking of Blago, that's frickin' golden.
I don't care for her voting record- big government- more taxes- anti-creation- anti parental rights.
http://www.ontheissues.org/Senate/Barbara_Boxer.htm
DSY
DSY </i>
No, she's an accurate representation of it. We're the embarrassment.
We're also the reason we're completely out of Federal Reserve Notes.
If we only had brains.