The Seventy Weeks of Daniel -- An Interpretation of Daniel 9:24-27 (Part Four)
Monday, July 27, 2020 at 02:26PM IV. The Seventieth Week of Daniel
When we come to Daniel 9:27 and read of someone who makes a strong covenant with the many for one week, we have come to an interpretive fork in the road. The critical question is whether or not Daniel is speaking about a future Antichrist making a seven-year peace treaty with Israel which marks the beginning of the tribulation. Or, is Daniel instead speaking of the coming of the Messiah, who makes a strong covenant on behalf of those whom he is about to redeem at the climax of his messianic mission? The choice is fundamental as to how we understand this prophecy. Christ or the Antichrist?
As noted, Daniel 9:24-27 is one of the most disputed and difficult prophecies in all the Old Testament. But everyone does agree that it is also one of the most important of Old Testament prophecies. Although those influenced by dispensationalism see this prophecy as predicting a future seven-year tribulation period and a peace treaty between Antichrist and Israel, as I have argued, the prophecy makes much better sense when seen as a messianic prophecy, predicting the coming of Jesus (Israel’s Messiah) with great accuracy and specificity–known as the “messianic interpretation.”
We come to the final week of Daniel’s prophecy–the so-called “Seventieth Week” which is described in verse 27. “And he shall make a strong covenant with many for one week, and for half of the week he shall put an end to sacrifice and offering. And on the wing of abominations shall come one who makes desolate, until the decreed end is poured out on the desolator.” Admittedly, this is a difficult verse to translate. It also raises a number of questions. Who is this covenant maker? And what is this strong covenant? How does he put an end to sacrifices and offering? What is the “wing of abomination?” And what does it mean that the end decreed is poured out on the desolator?
The debate over the proper interpretation of this prophecy largely turns on the identity of the “he” in verse 27, i.e., the one who makes a strong covenant with the many [See the helpful survey in; Baldwin, Daniel, 191-197]. Critical scholars contend that this was written after the fact, and claim it is a reference to Antiochus IV Epiphanes. Others (including dispensationalists) see this figure as Antichrist, connecting the “he” of verse 27 with “the people of the prince who is to come” (the Romans), bringing terror down upon Jerusalem and the temple as in the previous verse (v. 26). Still others, me included, see this as a reference to the coming Messiah, who, in making a strong covenant with the many (v. 27), brings to pass the six conditions required for the prophecy to be fulfilled (v. 24).
As mentioned in the preceeding posts in this series, we are given much help in this regard in the Olivet Discourse of Matthew 24 when Jesus instructs his disciples about future events in verses 15-22: “So when you see the abomination of desolation spoken of by the prophet Daniel, standing in the holy place (let the reader understand), then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains. Let the one who is on the housetop not go down to take what is in his house, and let the one who is in the field not turn back to take his cloak. And alas for women who are pregnant and for those who are nursing infants in those days! Pray that your flight may not be in winter or on a Sabbath. For then there will be great tribulation, such as has not been from the beginning of the world until now, no, and never will be. And if those days had not been cut short, no human being would be saved. But for the sake of the elect those days will be cut short."
The abomination of desolation spoken of by Jesus, quoting from Daniel 9:27, is clearly that brought about by the Roman armies of Titus in A.D. 70. Jesus warns all those present in Jerusalem that this will be the worst event Jerusalem will ever experience, and includes both the final destruction of the temple and a new exile of the Jews from Judah, this time into the ends of the earth. This desolation will be so terrible, Jesus warns, that when it begins, God’s people should drop everything and flee. But the prince who brings about destruction cannot be an end-times Antichrist, because, as Jesus says, this was fulfilled by the events of A.D. 70. Titus may serve as an illustration of an end-times Antichrist (as a type of the final Antichrist to come), but as Jesus says, this portion of the prophecy (the desolation of Jerusalem and the destruction of the temple) is clearly fulfilled by the events of A.D. 70.
There is another reason why the “he” of verse 27 cannot be “the prince who is to come” (either Titus or a future Antichrist). For one thing, although Titus accomplished one of the two things predicted (he put an end to sacrifices by destroying the temple), he did not make a covenant with “the many.” On the other hand, the subject of the clause in v. 26 is “the people” of the prince to come, not the prince himself [Gredianus, Preaching Christ from Daniel, 306]. The people cannot make a covenant! The covenant maker does. The desolation of Jerusalem is therefore tied to the messianic age and the Roman desolation of Jerusalem, not to the time of the end.
So, what does Daniel mean when he speaks of a coming one who will make a strong covenant with many for one week”? As Meredith Kline has pointed out, the verb used by Daniel (higbîr) is not a verb associated with making a new covenant, but instead with “confirming” a covenant which is already in place–i.e., the covenant of grace first promised in Genesis 3:15, immediately after Adam fell into sin [Kline, “The Covenant of the Seventieth Week,” 464-465]. This rules out an Antichrist figure in verse 27–because the Antichrist does not confirm a covenant with Israel which already exists, but supposedly makes an altogether new agreement with the Jews at the time of the end. Instead, the covenant maker, re-affirms a covenant which is already in place with the many–a similar expression to that found in the famous messianic prophecy of a suffering servant in Isaiah 52:13-53:12 between the servant (“he”) as the “sufferer”, and those on whose behalf he performs his redemptive work (“the many”), the people of God [Young, Daniel, 213].
When the “he” of verse 27 (the one who makes a strong covenant) is connected to the “anointed one [who] shall be cut off and shall have nothing,” in verse 26, i.e., the Messiah in his death and crucifixion, the focus of the seventieth week of Daniel’s prophecy is now clear. Daniel speaks of that period of time immediately after the sixty-two weeks when Jesus begins his messianic mission. The seventieth week of Daniel centers around the redemptive work the Messiah will accomplish–“making a strong [i.e., in the sense of confirming] a covenant” with the many. This means the seventieth week (at least the first half of it) is fulfilled by Jesus and is not a future event as dispensationalists insist.
In fact, verse 27 is a direct answer to Daniel’s prayer back in verses 4-6 of this same chapter. “I prayed to the Lord my God and made confession, saying, `O Lord, the great and awesome God, who keeps covenant and steadfast love with those who love him and keep his commandments, we have sinned and done wrong and acted wickedly and rebelled, turning aside from your commandments and rules.” In answer to Daniel’s prayer, Gabriel reveals that a Messiah will come and make a strong covenant, i.e., make strong, renew YHWH’s covenant already established with his people. YHWH keeps his covenants. He even renews them. He makes them strong.
This also fits nicely with a number of parallel passages, and is clearly tied to the six requirements for the prophecy to be fulfilled spelled out in verse 24. Jeremiah speaks of seventy years of exile for Israel, but he also foretold a new covenant which supersedes a covenant already in place. In Jeremiah 31:31-34, the prophet proclaims YHWH’s promise. “Behold, the days are coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and the house of Judah, not like the covenant that I made with their fathers on the day when I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt, my covenant that they broke, though I was their husband, declares the Lord. For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people. And no longer shall each one teach his neighbor and each his brother, saying, ‘Know the Lord,’ for they shall all know me, from the least of them to the greatest, declares the Lord. For I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more.”
It is important to notice that Jeremiah’s prophecy is, according to the author Hebrews, fulfilled by Jesus (Heb. 8, 10). The contents of the prophecy of the new covenant also bears a striking similarity to those six things Gabriel tells Daniel that must be fulfilled before the seventy weeks run their course–finish the transgression, to put an end to sin, and to atone for iniquity, to bring in everlasting righteousness, to seal both vision and prophet, and to anoint a most holy place. Daniel 9:24-27 has strong parallels to Jeremiah’s prophecy of a new covenant and comes as no surprise, given Daniel’s prayer and his plea that YHWH remember his covenant with his people. YHWH will make a strong, new and better covenant, grounded in the blood and righteousness of Jesus Christ.
We are now in a position to see that the work of the anointed one who was “cut off” (v. 26) is also that of making a strong covenant with many for one week–i.e., in the seventieth week of Daniel’s prophecy (v. 27). This means that the prophecy of the “seventy weeks” is fulfilled by none other than Jesus Christ, who in being cut-off and making a strong covenant fulfills the conditions required in verse 24. In his messianic mission, did Jesus not come to “finish transgression?” This does not in any sense mean that people will stop sinning, but that sin will be put away as a power of rebellion, and that such sin will be hidden from YHWH’s face [Young, Daniel, 198]. Did Jesus not come to “put an end to sin?” by removing it from YHWH’s presence by taking it away through the blotting out of guilt by his shed blood? Did Jesus not come to atone for iniquity? Here, one immediately thinks of the words of Isaiah 53:4–6: "Surely he has borne our griefs and carried our sorrows; yet we esteemed him stricken, smitten by God, and afflicted. But he was pierced for our transgressions; he was crushed for our iniquities; upon him was the chastisement that brought us peace, and with his wounds we are healed. All we like sheep have gone astray; we have turned—every one—to his own way; and the Lord has laid on him the iniquity of us all."
Finishing transgression, putting an end to sin, and atoning for iniquity are all acts associated with the so-called “passive obedience” of Jesus, in which he offered up himself (allowing himself to be crucified) to satisfy the Father’s wrath and anger toward our sin. These things must be accomplished before the seventy weeks are completed. Yet, Jesus accomplished all of these things, did he not?
But there are three more elements which must be established (Christ’s so-called “active” obedience). Did Jesus not “bring in an everlasting righteousness” by his perfect obedience? Does this not secure a perfect righteousness imputed to all those who believe in Jesus? Did Jesus not come as the final prophet of YHWH (to seal vision and prophet) as Moses predicted in Deuteronomy 18:15? When Jesus came, there was no more need of prophetic revelation such as that being given to Daniel by Gabriel, because in Jesus, YHWH is fully revealed [Young, Daniel, 200]. Finally, did not Jesus’ messianic mission begin when he was baptized and received the Holy Spirit, and the most holy (Jesus–the true temple of Israel) was anointed?
All six of these things are associated with Jesus’ messianic mission and are commonly understood in Reformed theology in terms of our Lord’s passive obedience, in which he offered himself as the final and once for all sacrifice for sin, and his passive obedience, in which he actively fulfilled all Old Testament prophecy and requirements of the law. As one writer concludes, “When our Lord ascended into heaven and the Holy Spirit descended, there remained not one of these six items of Daniel 9:24 that was not fully accomplished” [Cited in Young, Daniel, 198].
But two items remain before we wrap up. The first is the sentence which closes v. 27–“And on the wing of abominations shall come one who makes desolate, until the decreed end is poured out on the desolator.” This sentence is notoriously difficult to translate but thankfully Jesus helps us here when he quotes it in reference to the Roman sack of Jerusalem and destruction of the temple in AD 70. This is a reference to Titus and his legions. The wing of a bird of prey is an image used in the prophets (Isaiah 8:8; Jeremiah 48:40; 49:22; and Ezekiel 17:3, 7) for a swift moving army, while abominations which bring desolation refer to a detested thing (the Roman army) destroying a sacred thing (the Jerusalem temple), rendering it unclean [Steinmann, Daniel, 475].
The second is the problem raised by the fact that the covenant maker will, “make a strong covenant with many for one week, and for half of the week he shall put an end to sacrifice and offering.” How is it that the Messiah is cut-off in the middle of the seventieth week, leaving three and a half years unfulfilled yet ending the sacrifices. For one thing, Titus did put an end to the sacrifices when he destroyed the temple. But when Jesus died on Calvary (was “cut-off) and while making a strong covenant with the many, recall that at very moment he died something dramatic happened in the Jerusalem temple. As we read in Matthew 27:50–51, “and Jesus cried out again with a loud voice and yielded up his spirit. And behold, the curtain of the temple was torn in two, from top to bottom. And the earth shook, and the rocks were split.” In a theological sense, when Jesus died on the cross, any further sacrifices in that temple were an abomination to YHWH. All acceptable sacrifice in the temple ceased the moment Jesus died.
But what about the remaining three and a half years of the seventieth week? The covenant maker’s work is said to extend three and a half weeks (or half of the seventieth week–3½ years), but Daniel says nothing else about this. But in the Book of Revelation, the apostle John, whose vision, in many ways, fulfills the prophecies in the Book of Daniel, speaks several times about a period of time which lasts approximately 3½ years. In Revelation 11:2-3, John speaks of forty-two months and then of 1260 days. He does the same thing in Revelation 12:6 and 13:5. In Revelation 12:14, John speaks of a “times,” “a time” and “half a time” (3½ years). John applies this time reference to circumstances after the messianic mission of Jesus ends (with his death, resurrection, and ascension), yet before Jesus returns at the end of the age to raise the dead, judge the world, and make all things new. Even though Daniel never explains the remaining three and a half years of verse 27, the Apostle John indicates that this 3½ year period is actually the time of exile of God’s people between Jesus’ first and second advents–the age of the church militant.
According to John, what remains from Daniel’s seventy weeks is the time Christ’s church remains in its wilderness exile, until Jesus returns to usher in the ultimate jubilee and the everlasting Sabbath. As Meredith Kline tells us, "since the seventy weeks are ten jubilee eras that issue in the last jubilee, the seventieth week closes with the angelic trumpeting of the earth’s redemption and the glorious liberty of the children of God. The acceptable year of the Lord which came with Christ will then have fully come. Then the new Jerusalem whose temple is the Lord and the Lamb will descend from heaven (Rev. 21:10,22) and the ark of the covenant will be seen (Rev. 11:19), the covenant the Lamb has made to prevail and the Lord has remembered."
This means that the six requirements to complete the seventy weeks decreed by YHWH are met by Jesus in his work as Israel’s Messiah, who is the covenant mediator who establishes a new covenant through his shed blood and perfect obedience. The prophecy of the seventy weeks is not about a future Antichrist or a seven-year tribulation period. Rather, it is about the covenant making Messiah, who is cut-off, thereby “finishing the transgression, putting an end to sin, atoning for iniquity, bringing in everlasting righteousness, sealing both vision and prophet, and anointing a most holy place.”
The “seventy weeks” prophecy is not a map to the end times, although the last three and a half weeks of Daniel’s seventieth week symbolically depict Jesus’ ministry from his ascension until his return. Gabriel reveals this with great accuracy, and in doing so, reminds us in no uncertain terms that there is one gospel in both testaments, and that all of redemptive history centers around the person and work of Jesus–that one who is cut-off so as to save us from the guilt and power of sin, so as to bring us to the ultimate jubilee, and grant us our eternal Sabbath rest.
The “Seventy Weeks” is a messianic prophecy, which Jesus fulfills, by making a strong covenant with the many.
"The Seventy Weeks of Daniel -- An Interpretation of Daniel 9:24-27" (Part One)
"The Seventy Weeks of Daniel -- An Interpretation of Daniel 9:24-27" (Part Two)
"The Seventy Weeks of Daniel -- An Interpretation of Daniel 9:24-27" (Part Three)
Reader Comments