"For the Common Good" -- 1 Corinthians 12:4-11
![Date Date](/universal/images/transparent.png)
Here's the audio from yesterday's sermon, the twenty-third in a series on 1 Corinthians.
click here
Living in Light of Two Ages
____________________________
Here's the audio from yesterday's sermon, the twenty-third in a series on 1 Corinthians.
click here
On this edition of the program Michael Horton talks with Tullian Tchividjian about his new book Surprised by Grace: God's Relentless Pursuit of Rebels. The book walks readers through the story of Jonah and provides a good example of how to read an Old Testament text with Christ at the center. Mike and Tullian also discuss the value of employing a redemptive historical method of biblical interpretation.
"We believe a man to be not simply justified through faith alone, but through faith which works through love, that is to say, through faith and works. But [the idea] that faith can fulfill the function of a hand that lays hold on the righteousness which is in Christ, and can then apply it unto us for salvation, we know to be far from all Orthodoxy. For faith so understood would be possible in all, and so none could miss salvation, which is obviously false. But on the contrary, we rather believe that it is not the correlative of faith, but the faith which is in us, justifies through works, with Christ. But we regard works not as witnesses certifying our calling, but as being fruits in themselves, through which faith becomes efficacious, and as in themselves meriting, through the Divine promises (cf. 2 Corinthians 5:10) that each of the Faithful may receive what is done through his own body, whether it be good or bad."
Leave your guess in the comments section below. Please no google searches or cheating! Answer to follow next week.
This comes from the Confession of Dositheus in 1672. It may be found here in its entirety. http://www.crivoice.org/creeddositheus.html.
According to Dennis Bratcher, here's the background to the document. "A Synod of Eastern Orthodox Churches was called in Jerusalem in 1672 to refute the position of Cyril Lucaris, Patriarch of Constantinople, who had published a Confession in which he attempted to express Orthodox beliefs in terms of the predestination beliefs of Calvinism. From a Reformation perspective, he had also challenged some of the important religious practices of the Eastern churches, such as the veneration of icons and prayers to the saints. Orthodox leaders contended that the Confession of Cyril was a forgery perpetrated by Calvinists to spread their influence among Eastern churches. They presented quotations from known writings of Cyril to show that he had not held the positions expressed in the Confession. In addition, they argued that the Confession was not an official pronouncement by an Orthodox Patriarch."
Here's a brief primer on the basics of the Reformed doctrine of the two kingdoms.
As you consider the distinctions between these two kingdoms, please keep in mind the following presuppositions upon which the distinctions are based:
1). Christ is Lord of both kingdoms. He rules the kingdom of Christ (regnum gratiae) as the mediator of the covenant of grace, and he rules the civil kingdom (regnum potentiae) as sovereign Lord.
2). Every Christian is simultaneously a citizen of both kingdoms (Philippians 3:20; Romans 13:1-7).
3). The state is a post-fall, common grace institution given by God for the administration of justice and to restrain evil (Genesis 4:18 ff; Romans 13:1-7).
4). Non-Christians do not accept or acknowledge Christ's Lordship over the civil kingdom. This is the basis for the antithesis between Christian and non-Christian ways of thinking and doing. The failure to acknowledge Christ's Lordship renders one guilty before God (Romans 1:18-25), but does not invalidate the civil kingdom or the non-Christian's place in it.
5). While Paul calls Rome a minister of God (Romans 13:4), a generation later John describes that same empire as the beast, empowered by the dragon to persecute the people of God (Revelation 13). The Christian's confession that "Jesus is Lord," is likewise a confession that Caesar isn't. Christians must be cognizant that the kingdom of Christ can be seen as a threat to the power of the state. In fact, throughout Scripture, the state is the dragon's weapon of last resort against Christ and his kingdom.
6). From the time Adam was cast from Eden, God has intended the kingdom of Christ (the church) to dwell and advance in the midst of the civil kingdom (the world). This is the foundation for the missionary endeavors of the church, as well as a hedge against either utopianism (an over-realized eschatology) or escapism (i.e., monasticism).
The Distinction Between the Two Kingdoms
Christ's Kingdom
This is a spiritual kingdom and is ruled by Christ in his mediatorial office, in and through the historical manifestation of the covenant of grace (the church)
The Civil Kingdom
Here we speak of human government (the state) and Christ's rule over the earth and its creatures (the kingdom of power), according to God’s divine purpose for humanity (his eternal decree)
__________________________________
Christ's Kingdom
The charter of Christ’s kingdom is the “Great Commission” (cf. Matthew 28:16-20)
The Civil Kingdom
The foundation of the civil kingdom is the “Cultural Mandate” (Genesis 1:28' Genesis 9:6-7)
___________________________________
Christ's Kingdom
The church is given the keys of the kingdom (Matthew 16:19). The kingdom is closed to the unrepentant and heretics through church discipline
The Civil Kingdom
The state is given the sword (Romans 13:4). Those who break the law are subject to civil and criminal justice
___________________________________
Christ's Kingdom
Requires “spiritual discernment” (1 Corinthians 1:13 ff; 2:14)
The Civil Kingdom
Requires the light of nature (i.e., general revelation--Romans 2:14-15)
____________________________________
Christ's Kingdom
Christ’s kingdom is manifest on earth through the ordinary means of grace and through those biblically mandated activities of the church (i.e., evangelism, discipleship, and diaconal ministries)
The Civil Kingdom
The civil kingdom is manifest in all human cultural endeavors and governing institutions. In the civil kingdom, Christian citizens seek to be salt and light as they fulfill their callings and vocations along with their non-Christian neighbors
____________________________________
Christ's Kingdom
The focus is upon our heavenly citizenship (Philippians 3:20-21)–which is realized in our membership in Christ’s church. The church is the assembly of Christian believers
The Civil Kingdom
The focus is upon our national citizenship (i.e., the country of our birth, or of which we are presently citizens). As such, this kingdom includes all people (Christians and non-Christians alike) who are citizens of a given nation/society
____________________________________
Christ Kingdom
Entrance is granted into this kingdom only by virtue of regeneration. The focus is upon redemptive grace–God saving his people from the guilt and power of sin
The Civil Kingdom
Entrance into the civil kingdom is granted by virtue of birth (or naturalization). The focus here is upon common grace–God providing for all of his creatures
____________________________________
Christ's Kingdom
As citizens of Christ’s kingdom, we live under the authority of Christ as revealed in Scripture (special revelation)
The Civil Kingdom
In the civil kingdom, we live under the authority of the laws of the land (i.e., general revelation and natural law)
____________________________________
Consequences of Confusing the Two Kingdoms or Denying our Dual Citizenship
When these two kingdoms are confused or conflated, we see the rise of the "social gospel" of Protestant liberalism, American civil religion of the Christian right and the liberal left, as well as the rise of Constantianism (Christendom). The church must never take up the sword and Caesar must never enter the pulpit.
When the Christian's dual citizenship is denied (or ignored), we see the rise of asceticism, pietism, radical pacifism and Anabaptism.
Therefore, a Christian is free to work with non-Christians in the civil kingdom to promote the common good and preserve a just society. But the kingdom of Christ is tied to word and sacrament and the church (and its officers and members) must speak to the pressing moral issues of the day in terms of law and gospel, not in terms of the political activism found in the civil kingdom. Yes, the church must address moral issues as they are found and framed in Scripture (through the preaching and catechetical function of the church), but the church is not to engage in partisan politics, nor endorse any political party or candidate.
Ken Samples (who teaches our Sunday morning Bible Class @ Christ Reformed and who frequently lectures at our Academy) was recently interviewed by the Jude 3 Project.
Ken answers ten questions and explains his interest in Augustine and his baseball days.
Ken is truly a scholar and a gentlemen--people actually call him the "nice Calvinist." One caveat however--he does prefer cats to dogs.
You'll enjoy the interview: Ten Questions for Ken Samples
The cynic in me believes that one reason why the legal community has tended to support gay marriage is that same-sex marriages will increase the number of divorce cases--probably exponentially. Well, one Texas court has thrown a gay couple a real curve--no divorce because there is no gay marriage--at least in Texas! No gay divorce in Texas
A Dobson-Beck alliance? A black robe regiment of "Christian conservatives"? What is that all about? Now I am really creeped out. More two-kingdom confusion at its finest. A Beck-Dobson Alliance?
The Jesus Seminar--which, apparently, has miraculously resurrected itself--is now celebrating the 25th anniversary of their collective tantrum against their fundamentalist up-bringing. I noticed that one of the featured speakers deals with the thesis that Paul was not a Christian. OK . . . What else would you expect from these guys and gals? Jesus Seminar's 25th Anniversary
Finally, this strikes close to home. Should sex offenders be allowed in church?
As you may know, Christ Reformed has had to deal with this issue--what do you do when a Megan's law offender becomes a Reformed Christian and wants to worship with you? You let him worship, but escort him at all times while he is on campus, and you warn people that he's there (see Christ Reformed's policy here: Christ Reformed's Megan's Law policy). The results of the CT poll pretty much jibe with the reaction we've gotten from church members.
The White Horse Inn blog has posted a number of helpful resources on the two kingdoms and why we must keep them distinct. Beck's Two Kingdom Confusion
If we don't, we'll end up with a Mormon leading Jews, Muslims and Evangelicals together in prayer . . . Wait, that just happened!
If we understand the two kingdoms, we'll understand why it would be perfectly OK for these diverse groups to work together on political causes, if only they kept their civil religion out of it!
Somebody ought to write a book on this!
Here's the audio from Sunday's sermon, the twenty-first in a series on 1 Corinthians.
Click here
According to Australian theologian Graeme Goldsworthy, author of Gospel-Centered Hermeneutics, and According to Plan, the gospel of Christ is the central story of the entire Bible. But if this is the case, how then do we interpret various Old and New Testament texts in light of that fact? On this program, Michael Horton talks with Graeme about this question and other related issues addressed in his many books on this theme.
"For Christians concerned about Glenn [Beck]'s faith, I would ask the following questions: What fruit do you see produced by Glenn? . . . Good or bad? If you judged Glenn only by the fruits he has produced, would you still hold concerns over his faith? Christians concerned about Glenn's faith should judge the tree by its fruits, not its labels . . . After all, Nancy Pelosi and Bill Clinton openly call themselves Christians... Although these individuals have the right labels, they have the wrong fruits."
You know the drill! Leave your guess in the comments section below. Please, no google searches or cheating.
This is from Barton's facebook page (as cited in a recent CNN story--http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/2010/08/27/some-evangelicals-on-defensive-over-partnering-with-glenn-beck-a-mormon/).
Apparently, Beck's political views constitute the appropriate "fruit of the Spirit," despite the fact that Beck is a member of a heretical sect, the LDS.
Confusion of the two kingdoms at its finest!