Should I Comment? Probably Not . . .

There are times when a particular news story or headline cries out for comment here @ the Riddleblog.

There are other times when it is better to say nothing, and let the headline speak for itself. 

OK, so here goes:  "Devil is in the Vatican."

Hmmm . . .   Here's the link.  Vatican Exorcist

Just because I'm not going to comment, doesn't mean that you can't!

Comments

[Carter]

I bet this guy was like a priestly rock star back in the day. Sounds like he even has roadies to hold down victims! Err, I mean, possessees.

So since one of their own is throwing this lingo around, does that mean we can start calling the pope anti-christ again? Gotta miss the good ol' days.

[Stan McCullars]

Sounds like the Vatican agrees with the Reformers.

[Charles L. Baker]

Who speaking by the Spirit of God would say that confessional Protestants are damned...as in the illicit anathemas of the Tridentine Council? By all means, the Papacy is antichrist.

[pb]

I thought the devil was in the details...?

["lee n. field"]

Didn't Malachi Martin say pretty much the same thing (Satanists at the Vatican), years and years ago?

[Rev. Z. Bartels]

> I thought the devil was in the details...?

No, the devil's in the phone lines.

Oh, and Jackson 44... *eloquently* put. (Both times.) Pffft.

[Kim Riddlebarger]

Jackson 44's comments have been deleted for violating the "blue language" rule.

[Gage Browning]

No suprise to Presbyterians...at least the ones who don't take an exception to the WCF!

[Timinator]

So I guess they are blaming the devil on all there problems

[hiram diaz]

This is both hilarious and saddening.