Social Network Links
Powered by Squarespace
Search the Riddleblog
"Amillennialism 101" -- Audio and On-Line Resources

 

Living in Light of Two Ages

____________________________

Tuesday
Mar172009

What's Wrong with Baseball These Days?

Baseball is not the same game it was when I was a kid. That's no surprise.  A sport should evolve over a generation or two.

Ty Cobb and Babe Ruth prove that baseball players of earlier generations were certainly not saints.  When I read Jim Bouton's Ball Four as an impressionable teenager, I quickly realized that my Yankee heroes were very flawed men--an important life lesson that has served me well.  Baseball has always had its scandals and woes.  That's nothing new and not the point.  Something else is wrong.

And while people may not like the bloated Yankee payroll, the fact is that Yankees luxury tax payments help keep small market teams afloat.  Those criticisms are partisan and ring hollow in my ears.  The Yankees' business model is very sound and they make tons of money.  As I see it, most complaints like this are rivalry based, or just old fashioned envy.  It is to be expected.  

While free agency changed the game in profound ways, some good, some not so good, the marriage of sports and entertainment has been disastrous, especially for a non-TV sport like baseball.  Since ESPN, Disney, and ABC now serve the same corporate master, the result is the gross thing pictured here--the athlete-celebrity kissing himself in the mirror for a tell-all piece in a men's magazine.  Since when did male sports fans start reading tell-all articles like those in People?  That is what happens when sports marries entertainment.  The star baseball player is known for his celebrity power as much as for his athleticism.

Steroids are bad enough--using them is cheating, plain and simple.  But the self-idolatry pictured above (yes, its a campy photo for an article and wasn't intended to be taken too seriously--Click here: A-Rod gives a few details to Details | The LoHud Yankees Blog), is one of the clearest indications yet of what is wrong with professional sports in general, and baseball in particular.

What happened to those little boys (like in the Sandlot), who never really grew up, playing an absolutely great game for the sheer fun of it?

Thanks to ABC, Disney, and ESPN, we get A-Rod kissing himself in a mirror.  But that is the spirit of the age, isn't it?

Tuesday
Mar172009

The Founding Fathers of Western Civilization

Since the readers of this blog seem to enjoy lists, here's another (from the same friend and colleague who submitted this list earlier -- Click here: Riddleblog - The Latest Post - The Twelve GreatestAmericans)

Have some fun with this one!

 

 

Christendom’s Founding Fathers of Western Civilization:

1. Augustine
2. Thomas Aquinas
3. Christopher Columbus
4. Martin Luther
5. John Calvin
6. Nicholas Copernicus
7. Michelangelo
8. Blaise Pascal
9. John Locke
10. Jonathan Edwards
11. Isaac Newton
12. William Wilberforce

You've got to figure out how to get Bach and Shakespeare on this list, but who goes?  Columbus, probably . . .  Copernicus or Locke?  Not so sure.

Monday
Mar162009

"He Is the True God and Eternal Life" -- 1 John 5:13-21

Here's the eleventh in a series of sermons on the Epistles of John.

http://links.christreformed.org/realaudio/MS20090315-1John.mp3

Monday
Mar162009

Academy Lecture Posted -- Ancient Church (Part Four)

Rev. Souza’s fourth academy lecture has been posted. The lecture is entitled, “Council of Nicea, Christological Controversies, Ecumenical Councils.”

http://links.christreformed.org/realaudio/A20090313-AncientChurch.mp3

Saturday
Mar142009

Who Said That?

"Furthermore, [we reject the error] that original sin is only an external impediment to man's good spiritual powers and not the complete deprivation or loss of the same, just as garlic juice, smeared on a magnet, impedes but does not remove the natural powers of the magnet."

Have fun with this one!  Leave your guess in the comments section below.  Answer to follow next week.  No google searches or cheating.

Thursday
Mar122009

Friday Night's Academy Lecture

Join us Friday, March 13, at 7:30 p.m. when Rev. Marcelo Souza continues the Academy series entitled: Ancient Church History, An Overview. Rev. Souza’sfourth lecture is: “Council of Nicea, Christological Controversies, Ecumenical Councils”

This class will cover early Church history from the birth of the Church to the first seven Ecumenical Councils. Our study will investigate both ecclesiastical history and historical theology. Some of the questions that will be addressed include: How did doctrine develop? What issues did each ecumenical council address? How does the theology of the early Church affect us today? What heresies keep reappearing? What do we learn from the past so we don’t repeat the same mistakes in the future?

The textbooks for this series are: Early Christian Doctrines: Revised Edition by J. N. D. Kelly and The Early Church by Henry Chadwick

Thursday
Mar122009

The Canons of Dort, Third/Fourth Head of Doctrine, Article Ten

Article 10: Conversion as the Work of God

The fact that others who are called through the ministry of the gospel do come and are brought to conversion must not be credited to man, as though one distinguishes himself by free choice from others who are furnished with equal or sufficient grace for faith and conversion (as the proud heresy of Pelagius maintains). No, it must be credited to God: just as from eternity he chose his own in Christ, so within time he effectively calls them, grants them faith and repentance, and, having rescued them from the dominion of darkness, brings them into the kingdom of his Son, in order that they may declare the wonderful deeds of him who called them out of darkness into this marvelous light, and may boast not in themselves, but in the Lord, as apostolic words frequently testify in Scripture.

_________________________________

When it comes to the matter of people coming to faith in Christ, the Reformed place their confidence in the power of God, rather than in the natural ability of sinful men and women. It is quite appropriate at this point for the authors of the Canons to set forth the fact that conversion (which is defined as a person’s coming to faith, as well as the subsequent exercise of repentance) is not the work of the sinner, but is solely the work of God upon the sinner.

In this, we see yet again the Trinitarian emphasis of Reformed ordo salutis (order of salvation). The Father has chosen those whom he will save (redemption decreed). The Father has sent Jesus Christ to die on the cross as the satisfaction for the guilt of the sins of those that he has chosen (redemption accomplished). When the gospel is preached, those whom the Father has chosen, and for whom Christ has died, are effectually called to faith in Christ by the Holy Spirit (redemption applied).

As we have seen in the First Head of Doctrine (Article Five), this is the pattern laid out for us by the Apostle Paul in the opening chapter of his letter to the Ephesians (1:3-14):

3 Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us in Christ with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places, 4 even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love 5 he predestined us for adoption as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will, 6 to the praise of his glorious grace, with which he has blessed us in the Beloved. 7 In him we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of our trespasses, according to the riches of his grace, 8 which he lavished upon us, in all wisdom and insight 9 making known to us the mystery of his will, according to his purpose, which he set forth in Christ 10 as a plan for the fullness of time, to unite all things in him, things in heaven and things on earth. 11 In him we have obtained an inheritance, having been predestined according to the purpose of him who works all things according to the counsel of his will, 12 so that we who were the first to hope in Christ might be to the praise of his glory. 13 In him you also, when you heard the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation, and believed in him, were sealed with the promised Holy Spirit, 14 who is the guarantee of our inheritance until we acquire possession of it, to the praise of his glory.

Paul is very clear that election was “in Christ” before the foundation of the world (1:4). Such election is based solely upon God’s own pleasure and purpose (1:9, 11). The Apostle also points out in verse 7, that Jesus Christ came in history to accomplish what was necessary for our redemption, namely the forgiveness of the guilt of our sins through the shedding of his blood. And then in verse 13, Paul points out that the believer was included in Christ, “when you heard the word of truth.” Here, Paul is speaking about the time of conversion. Redemption must not only be decreed in eternity and accomplished during Christ’s messianic mission, but such redemption must be applied at the moment in time when we believe (conversion). Paul plainly attributes such conversion to the work of the Holy Spirit.

Article Ten of the Canons simply restates what has already been said repeatedly throughout the earlier heads of doctrine, namely "the fact that others who are called through the ministry of the gospel do come and are brought to conversion must not be credited to man, as though one distinguishes himself by free choice from others who are furnished with equal or sufficient grace for faith and conversion (as the proud heresy of Pelagius maintains)."

As we have seen, the fallen human will is held captive to both the darkened understanding of the mind as well as sinful desires of the flesh. While able to make choices (an essential part of what it means to be human) we must ask, “what choices will such a fallen will make when enslaved to sinful desires and passions, and unable to discern or understand spiritual things?” The answer is simple–anything but Christ. A bad tree bears only bad fruit. A sinner who can do nothing to save themselves, will quite naturally hate a holy Savior who holds their fate in his hands.

It is positively unbiblical to speak of conversion as the work of the sinner (i.e, the making of a choice, the exercise of the will,etc.), when it is clear that conversion is the work of God the Holy Spirit, applying the saving benefits of Jesus Christ to God’s elect, who now in turn embrace the gospel and trust in Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of their sins and the gift of eternal life. Those who believe, do so only because God has effectually called them through the gospel, and not because they supposedly used their free or natural ability to believe and come to the savior. This is the heresy of the Pelagians and the Canons rightly call out those who still champion this ancient error.

It is clear that “salvation is of the Lord”–a point which the Canons clearly make, when they state, “No, it must be credited to God: just as from eternity he chose his own in Christ, so within time he effectively calls them, grants them faith and repentance, and, having rescued them from the dominion of darkness, brings them into the kingdom of his Son, in order that they may declare the wonderful deeds of him who called them out of darkness into this marvelous light, and may boast not in themselves, but in the Lord, as apostolic words frequently testify in Scripture.”

This is what distinguishes Reformed theology from all other systems of Christian theology (even other Augustinian varieties such as Lutheranism). In every case, the Scriptures declare (and the Canons reiterate this over and over again), that the saving operations of God are not directed to “the world” generically, or to people impersonally as nameless, faceless, individuals. The Scriptures know not of a people for whom God provides a “potential” salvation, and for whom God does nothing to actually save the individual sinner, except to provide them with a means to save themselves, if only they will.

This is the fatal biblical weakness in all forms of universalism. In every case, the Bible teaches that the saving actions of God are directed effectually to specific individuals that God intends to save. The Scripture teaches that the shepherd knows his sheep, and that they know him.

Wednesday
Mar112009

"The Lord Will Rule Over You" -- Judges 8:4-35

The Eleventh in a Series of Sermons on the Book of Judges

Like many of you, I recall hearing countless sermons throughout the years which were basically character studies of the great saints from redemptive history. One of those saints was Gideon. If all you had was Judges 6-7 and Hebrews 11, you could reasonably conclude that Gideon was a great man of God, whom God used to save Israel at one of the nation’s darkest hours. That’s why the Gideon Society chose his name when beginning their world-wide ministry of distributing Bibles. In fact, the Gideons tell us that “Gideon was a man who was willing to do exactly what God wanted him to do, regardless of his own judgment as to the plans or results. Humility, faith, and obedience were his great elements of character.” But when you read the rest of the story of Gideon–Judges 8:4-35–it becomes all too clear that Gideon was a sinful man who used his power to take revenge upon his enemies. It was Gideon who made an ephod (a priestly garment) which became a stumbling block for the people of Israel. Therefore, Gideon’s character should be studied by all of us. Why? Is he a role model? No. We study him because we are just like him. We too are sinful from head to toe, and the only truly good things we do stem from the fact that God works in us through the power of the Holy Spirit. When left to ourselves, we’ll do just as Gideon did–we’ll use the good gifts God has given to us for our own personal gain and benefit.

As we continue our study of the Book of Judges, we are in that section of Judges which deals with the fifth in the series of judges (deliverers) whom God sent to rescue his people from a cruel oppressor. In Judges 6:1-8:3 (the first part of Judges’ account of the life of Gideon), we have seen God take this timid man and transform him into a mighty warrior who devised an audacious plan to defeat the Midianites, who were brutally oppressing the Israelites, to the point that many of God’s people were forced to live in caves or hide in the mountains. We have seen that the vacillating Gideon repeatedly sought a sign from the Lord to confirm his call and ensure that YHWH would fight on Israel’s side. When Gideon learned from a Midianite sentry that YHWH was going to give Israel a stunning victory over a huge Midianite army, finally, Gideon was willing to do as the Lord had commanded.

As YHWH commanded, Gideon pared down his army from 32,000 to 300 men. This was to make it crystal clear that YHWH gave Israel the victory when Gideon led his men into the Midianite camp in the middle of the night when Gideon’s men sounded their trumpets, smashed jars, lit torches, and shouted their battle cry. The Midianites were caught completely off-guard and panicked when they thought that an enemy army was in the midst of their camp. As the Midianites fled en masse east toward the Jordan River from whence they had come, Gideon called out the Israelite army who chased the Midianites back toward the Jordan, while the men of Ephraim (a neighboring tribe) were sent ahead of the Midianite army to take and hold the crossing points on the Jordan River. The men of Ephraim managed to capture two Midianite princes Oreb and Zeeb, who, apparently had caused the Israelites much grief during the Midianite oppression. These two princes were beheaded, their heads were given Gideon as the spoils of war. Although Midian had been defeated, soon they will be eliminated as a threat to Israel.

To read the rest of this sermon, click here

Tuesday
Mar102009

Ken Jones on "Issues, Etc."

Ken Jones, my White Horse Inn compatriot, was on Issues, Etc., on Monday (03/09/09).

Here's the link. http://www.issuesetc.org/podcast/181030909H1S3.mp3

 

Tuesday
Mar102009

Tough Times Ahead for Evangelicals and Protestants?

This will come as no surprise to readers of this blog. Religion is losing ground in America. That's not necessarily a bad thing--especially if its false religion that is on the decline.

Especially hard-hit are mainline Protestants and independent evangelical-type churches.  No surprise there.  Some points of interest in the survey.  The number of those who profess to hold no religion doubled to 15%.  People who self-consciously identify themselves as Christians has dropped 11% in a generation.  Catholics are moving west (out of the Northeast--that just means Catholics like warmer weather), while Muslims make up only .06% of respondents.  The latter is hard to believe, especially since there are so many Muslims in and around Orange County these days. Click here: Most religious groups in USA have lost ground, survey finds - USATODAY.com

Michael Spencer (the iMonk) has offered a very interesting take on the future of evangelicalism.  Spencer believes that "the loss of their political clout may impel many Evangelicals to reconsider the wisdom of trying to create a `godly society.' That doesn't mean they'll focus solely on saving souls, but the increasing concern will be how to keep secularism out of church, not stop it altogether. The integrity of the church as a countercultural movement with a message of `empire subversion' will increasingly replace a message of cultural and political entitlement."  A very interesting assessment.  Emergents don't fare well.  Neither do those churches which built their identities on political activism. Click here: The coming evangelical collapse | csmonitor.com

One group of dissenting Anglicans--sick of the rampant theological liberalism and decay coming out of Canterbury--are considering joining Rome.  The Traditional Anglican Communion has 400,000 members, is thoroughly Anglo-Catholic in emphasis, so this is no real surprise.  But any merger between the TAC and Rome would set back talks between Rome and the rest of the Anglican community.  The Anglicanism communion is a real mess these days.  Click here: The Associated Press: Traditional Anglicans want to join Catholic Church