Social Network Links
Powered by Squarespace
Search the Riddleblog
"Amillennialism 101" -- Audio and On-Line Resources

 

Living in Light of Two Ages

____________________________

Sunday
Feb222009

Who Said That?

When asked, "Would you ever be comfortable being a house husband?"

__________ answered.  "No, I have to go to work. I’m too much of a Calvinist.  If I don’t work every day, I get nervous."

This is an easy one!  Fill in the blank.  Leave your guess in the comments section below, and I'll post the answer next week.  Please, no google searches or cheating. 

Sunday
Feb222009

"A Noble Task" -- A Sermon for the Ordination and Installation of Elders and Deacons

Here's this morning's sermon on 1 Timothy 3:1-13 (on the occasion of the ordination and installation of new elders and deacons)

http://links.christreformed.org/realaudio/KR20090222-NobleTask.mp3

Sunday
Feb222009

Academy Lecture Posted -- Ancient Church (Part One)

Here's the audio from Rev. Marcelo Souza's Academy lecture (02/20/09) "Ancient Church History," Part One.

http://links.christreformed.org/realaudio/A20090220-AncientChurch.mp3

Thursday
Feb192009

Top "Reformed" Movies?

National Review Online just released their top 25 "conservative" movies.  I've only seen a couple of them, which means I'm not very conservative, or I have different tastes than John J. Miller, or I don't see as many movies. 

In any case, the top NRO film was "Lives of Others." Hmmm . . .  Here's their list.  Click here: The Best Conservative Movies on National Review / Digital

If NRO can have a top 25 of "conservative" movies, maybe we Reformed types (OK, we'll let our Lutheran and evangelical friends participate as well) can come up with our own list.

So, if you can think of any movie which you think every Reformed Christian ought to see, post them in the comments section below, and after some times goes by, I'll post the list.

As for me, here are a few I can think of (in no particular order) . . . I'm sure I'll add more later on (as I think of them).

Tombstone (1993) -- What can I say?  This is my all-time favorite movie.  I'll never forget seeing Mike Horton, Rod Rosenbladt, and R.C. Sproul watching this on pay-per-view in the Brown Palace Hotel in Denver (during CBA).  That scene of male-bonding is permanently etched in my memory.  I'm sure RC can still recite the dialogue from memory.

Cromwell (1993) -- As a historical drama, its so-so.  But it is rather chilling to see soldiers advance to battle while singing Psalms and holding banners with Bible verses.  The scene of the Arminian king Charles I's execution (Alec Guinness) is haunting.  As the executioner pulls the king's head from the basket and holds it up, he declares, "Behold!  Your king."  Man, is that powerful.

The Lord of the Rings trilogy -- Easily the most beautifully-done films I've ever seen.  Doesn't the Dark Lord Sauron and his army of Orcs remind us of the totalitarian/fascist state? 

Lady Jane (1985) -- Lady Jane Gray was Queen of England for a mere nine days.  The scene when she's grilled about the number of sacraments is very powerful.  A bit of a "chick flick" but still quite good.

To End All Wars (2001) -- A very powerful film which wrestles with the question, "what does it mean to love our enemies?" especially when the scene is the brutality of war and forced labor in a prison camp. 

Luther (2003) -- OK, its not as good as the old black and white film Martin Luther (1953), and we can quibble about some of the content, but it does a great job of giving us a sense of the times.

Babette's Feast (1989) -- Two Danish girls (daughters of a Lutheran pastor) prepare a glorious feast in a drab Danish village of drab Danish people.  The drab folks prefer their drab existence to the glorious meal freely offered them.  The Lutheran and sacramental imagery is obvious--but even we Reformed folk can appreciate the point.

Thursday
Feb192009

The Canons of Dort, Third/Fourth Head of Doctrine, Article Seven

Article 7: God’s Freedom in Revealing the Gospel

In the Old Testament, God revealed this secret of his will to a small number; in the New Testament (now without any distinction between peoples) he discloses it to a large number. The reason for this difference must not be ascribed to the greater worth of one nation over another, or to a better use of the light of nature, but to the free good pleasure and undeserved love of God. Therefore, those who receive so much grace, beyond and in spite of all they deserve, ought to acknowledge it with humble and thankful hearts; on the other hand, with the apostle they ought to adore (but certainly not inquisitively search into) the severity and justice of God's judgments on the others, who do not receive this grace.

______________________________________

While the Arminian champions the freedom of man, the Canons are clear that Christians must begin any discussion of God’s saving purposes where Scripture begins the discussion. This is not with the freedom of humanity, but with the freedom of God!

As we have seen throughout our discussion of prior articles, Scripture very clearly teaches that God has chosen to elect a vast multitude unto salvation based upon reasons known only to himself.  Furthermore, God has also determined how he will call those to faith whom he has chosen—through the preaching of the gospel.  This means he has ordained both ends (those whom he will save) and means (the preaching of the gospel).

In article 7, the Canons now make the point that God’s hidden decree (in eternity past) is carried out in time and space, of which the Scriptures are the divinely-inspired record.  This means that God’s plan–otherwise hidden in the shadows of eternity–is revealed publically in ordinary human history as we see God bring to pass the very things that he has decreed would come to pass!

In terms of a logical order, of course, we must begin with God’s eternal decree.  But when we view things historically in the Scriptures (i.e. as the things God has decreed unfold in redemptive history), we must begin where the Scriptures begin, which is not with what was hidden, but with the execution of that decree as it is revealed in the history of God’s people. This means that the Bible is both the explanatory record of God bringing to pass what he has decreed, as well as the history of the covenants (indeed, the covenant documents themselves!).  Since Jesus is the elect one (i.e., that the one in whom God’s elect are chosen), Jesus is also the mediator of God’s gracious covenant.  This means that redemptive history (the Bible) will be the record of Christ’s mediatorial work from beginning to end, and it will focus exclusively upon the unfolding drama of redemption.

The first point that is made in article seven is that God’s plan of redemption (i.e, the covenant of grace) was initially revealed “to a small number.”  Beginning with promise of a redeemer made to Adam immediately after the Fall in Genesis 3:15, running on through the elect line of Abel, Seth, Noah, and so on, until we get to Abraham, slowly and over time God revealed the gospel in more detail to each of the successive generations.  Jeremiah, who was one of the later prophets, prophesied the coming of a “new covenant.”  Jeremiah certainly knew more about the coming redeemer than did Adam.  This is why we must see the Bible as the record of this progressive unfolding of the one gospel of Jesus Christ described in article six.

The second point made in article seven is that this progressive revelation in the Old Testament finally culminates in the coming of Jesus Christ, when, in the fulness of time, the one mediator between God and man, formerly hidden deep within type and shadow, now enters center-stage of human history to accomplish those things necessary for our redemption (Galatians 4:4-6).  Since Jesus Christ has stepped out of eternity past into human history, this means that “in the New Testament (now without any distinction between peoples”—such as Jew and Gentile) God now reveals the gospel to a large number of people, namely to all the nations and peoples of the earth.

The mission of Israel, which Calvin called the church in its infancy, was very narrowly focused. Israel was that chosen nation to provide God’s people with a savior and to preserve God’s word.  But now that the Savior has been revealed, the gospel is now to go out to all the nations of the earth.

While in the Old testament the primary focus of redemption was limited to national Israel, in the New, the focus is now universal.  It was our Lord Jesus who gave the great commission to his church in Matthew 28:18-20—“And Jesus came and said to them, `All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, to the end of the age.”  This indicates that it is the mission of Christ’s church to take the message of reconciliation to all the earth.  The preached gospel is God the Holy Spirit’s means to call all of God’s elect to faith in Jesus Christ.

As the Canons go on to point out, God is perfectly free to decree whatsoever comes to pass according to his own pleasure and purpose.  He is equally free to execute that decree in ordinary history as he sees fit.  It is God’s will that he chose Israel to be the apple of his eye—it was certainly not because he foresaw Israel’s faithfulness and desire to do his will. Indeed, the Old Testament is in many ways the story of God’s faithfulness despite Israel’s repeated unbelief and unfaithfulness.  God chose Israel not because of anything good he foresaw in his people.  Rather, he chose Israel because it was his purpose to do so.

When we turn to the New Testament it is clear that it is God’s will that he chose a people in Christ from before the foundation of the world.  In fact, he chooses a multitude so vast that no man can number them.  This is why the authors go on to state “the reason for this difference must not be ascribed to the greater worth of one nation over another, or to a better use of the light of nature, but to the free good pleasure and undeserved love of God.” God will certainly bring what he has decreed to pass and accomplish his purposes and this means that history itself is God’s decree being executed in time and in space.

By now it should be clear that God does not simply set things in motion—as the Deists (and some Arminians contend)—and then steps back and watches things play out, and only then, does he elect some unto salvation based upon his foreknowledge of what his creatures will do when the gospel is preached to them.  Those whom God foreknows will believe are then elected, while those who will not believe are not-elected.

However, this is nothing but a practical deism, in which God is bound to act based only upon what his creatures do.  For many Arminians, man has free will, but God’s will is bound by the responses of his creatures.  It is simply amazing that the Arminian system is based upon the myth of the human will’s freedom from bondage to human sin, while at the same time predicating that God’s will is in bondage to the “free” will of man.

This should once and for all remove any ground for human boasting. In the Old Testament, God chose Israel because of sovereign pleasure and purpose, while in the New Testament, we are told that God has chosen a multitude so vast the no one can count them, also based upon his pleasure and purpose.  This is why the Canons conclude, “therefore, those who receive so much grace, beyond and in spite of all they deserve, ought to acknowledge it with humble and thankful hearts; on the other hand, with the apostle they ought to adore (but certainly not inquisitively search into) the severity and justice of God's judgments on the others, who do not receive this grace."

Wednesday
Feb182009

"What Christ Has Accomplished" -- Romans 15:14-16:16

The Thirty-Sixth in a Series of Sermons on Paul's Epistles to the Romans

Having finished the main body of his letter to the church in Rome, and completed his discussion of a number of lofty doctrinal themes, Paul now turns to more mundane matters as he wraps up his epistle to the Romans. Paul informs his reader of his earnest desire to visit the church in Rome, but explains that thus far has been prevented from doing so. Then, there are some practical matters to which Paul must attend–the commendation of Phoebe, the woman who will deliver this letter to Rome, as well as personal greetings to be extended to a number of friends and acquaintances living in the city. Lest we forget Paul’s letter to the church in Rome is not a lecture on Christian doctrine, but a pastoral letter to church which Paul has never visited although, as we will see, he is certainly familiar with many of its members.

We now come to the final section of the Book of Romans–Paul’s concluding remarks–as the apostle wraps up his theological discussion and exhortations regarding some of the pressing pastoral problems facing this particular church. Having completed this discussion, Paul describes his personal situation and discusses his plans for the future, specifically as they relate to the church in Rome. This final section is in many ways an expansion of the remarks made back in Romans 1:8-15 when Paul opened this epistle by expressing, in part, his reasons for writing. Now Paul goes on to express his confidence in the members of this church because the maturity of the Roman Christians will enable them to capably handle some of the difficult issues he has raised. Indeed, the very nature of this discussion requires Paul to explain his role as apostle to the Gentiles as well as offer the reason as to why it is that his apostolic duties have prevented him from visiting Rome thus far, although it is certainly his earnest desire to do so if he is able to make a future visit to Spain.

But before he can go on to Spain and stop in the city of Rome on the way, the apostle must return to Jerusalem with the proceeds of an offering for the poor Jewish Christians in that city collected from among the Gentile churches in Macedonia and Achaia. In the midst of this discussion of his future plans, we find yet another Pauline prayer-wish–a prayer in which Paul exhorts the Christians in Rome by allowing them to overhear that for which he is praying. Next, in the opening verses of chapter 16, Paul goes on to mention a woman named Phoebe, who serves as the bearer of this letter to the church in Rome. Then in verses 3-15, Paul extends his greetings to a list of individuals in the Roman church with whom he is familiar before exhorting them to great one another in the Lord. Finally, in verses 17-27 (our subject the next Lord’s Day), Paul gives one final piece of pastoral advice to the church, before warning the Roman Christians to be on their guard against false teachers and exhorting them to live up to their outstanding reputation among the churches.

To read the rest of this sermon, click here

Wednesday
Feb182009

So, the Truth Comes Out . . .

This was posted on a Yankees fan blog.  I couldn't resist.

While steroids is a real issue for baseball, so, apparently, is the vision of some of the MLB umpires.

Tuesday
Feb172009

The Missing Story of Muslim Tolerance

The man who once lamented "every day on television we are barraged by stories of a 'Muslim extremist, militant, terrorist, or insurgent,' is now charged with beheading his wife in an "honor" killing.  In 2004, Muzzammil Hassan, founder of the Muslim TV station "Bridges TV" declared "the stories that are missing are the countless stories of Muslim tolerance, progress, diversity, service and excellence that Bridges TV hopes to tell."  Well, now his wife can't tell her story of physical abuse, domestic violence, divorce, and restraining orders.  Mr. Hassan killed Mrs. Hassan and then chopped off her head before turning himself into Orchard Park, NY, police.  Click here: FOXNews.com - Muslim Television Channel Founder Charged With Beheading His Wife - Local News | News Articles | Nat

Here's some weird science.  According to one of those "they're here" scientists, that rhino-virus in your nose might just be an alien life force looking for a new home.  No, seriously . . . click here: FOXNews.com - Scientist: Alien 'Shadow Life' May Already Live on Earth - Science News | Science & Technology | Tec

According to a Soho Vicar, the brothel down the street is just fine by him.  He's never seen drugs being sold there.  My question is rather obvious.  How would he know that?  Click here: Vicar fights to keep brothel in business | Metro.co.uk

The Church of England is beyond words.  Should the CoE attempt to convert people to Christianity or not?  How 'bout we put that to a vote.  Click here: BBC NEWS | UK | Church to debate conversion rules

Monday
Feb162009

New Academy Series -- Ancient Church History

Join us Friday, February 20 at 7:30 p.m. when Rev. Marcelo Souza begins a new Academy series entitled: Ancient Church History, An Overview. Rev. Souza’s first lecture is: “Introduction, socio-political context of the primitive church, church organization”

This class will cover early church history from the birth of the church to the first seven ecumenical councils. Our study will investigate both ecclesiastical history and historical theology. Some of the questions that will be addressed include: How did doctrine develop? What issues did each ecumenical council address? How does the theology of the early Church affect us today? What heresies keep reappearing? What do we learn from the past so we don’t repeat the same mistakes in the future?

Rev. Souza is the associate pastor of Christ Reformed Church.  He is a graduate of Biola University (B.A.), Westmister Seminary California (M.Div.), and is in the Ph.D. program at the Claremont Graduate University.

The textbooks for this series are: Early Christian Doctrines: Revised Edition by J. N. D. Kelly and The Early Church by Henry Chadwick

Monday
Feb162009

Another Reason Why I Am Not a Francophile

According to a survey in Classic & Sports Car magazine, the Citroen DS was voted "the most beautiful car" of all time.

There is no way that the Citroen DS is the most beautiful car of all time!  The ugliest, maybe . . .  What about the Jaguar XKE, or the Mercedes-Benz SL300 Gull-Wing?  These autos are works of art.

And besides, the Citroen is French. The voters in this poll must have been as well.

Here's the link to the poll. Click here: Citroen DS Named Most Beautiful Car Ever - Automotive News Story - WBAL Baltimore