Social Network Links
Powered by Squarespace
Search the Riddleblog
"Amillennialism 101" -- Audio and On-Line Resources

 

Living in Light of Two Ages

____________________________

Thursday
Jun052008

The Canons of Dort, First Head of Doctrine, Rejection of Errors, Paragraph Eight

Synod%20of%20Dort.jpgSynod condemns the error of those . . .

VIII  Who teach that it was not on the basis of his just will alone that God decided to leave anyone in the fall of Adam and in the common state of sin and condemnation or to pass anyone by in the imparting of grace necessary for faith and conversion.

For these words stand fast: He has mercy on whom he wishes, and he hardens whom he wishes (Rom. 9:18). And also: To you it has been given to know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been given (Matt. 13:11). Likewise: I give glory to you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that you have hidden these things from the wise and understanding, and have revealed them to little children; yes, Father, because that was your pleasure (Matt. 11:25_26).


________________________________________

The error identified and refuted in paragraph eight is one which attempts to locate reprobation in people’s  misuse of their freedom, not in the sovereign will of God.  According to this error, people somehow manage to reprobate themselves, by using their free will in such a way as to disqualify themselves from that which they could have otherwise obtained–salvation from sin.  In other words, these people could have co-operated with God’s grace, and then believed the gospel.  Instead, they “chose poorly,” as someone once put it.

This erroneous notion results from the Arminian contention that despite the fall of the human race into sin, men and women are still able to co-operate with the grace of God, and when they do so, they are thereby inclined to believe, repent, and live in holiness before God.  When the logic of the Arminian view is applied to those whom do not chose co-operate with God’s grace (the reprobate), the reason given as to why these people are not numbered among the elect is because they did not chose to believe, repent, and live a holy life before God.  To put it crudely, they reprobated themselves by not co-operating with grace.
 
As stated previously in the Canons, there are three reasons why people are numbered among the reprobate.  First, God does not chose all to receive eternal life, and the reprobate are left “in the common misery into which, by their own fault, they have plunged themselves.”  Second, God does not “grant them saving faith and the grace of conversion,” meaning that he leaves them in the same condition in which they are in Adam (fallen).  Third, God will “eternally punish them (having been left in their own ways and under his just judgment), not only for their unbelief but also for all their other sins, in order to display his justice.”  

This means that the reason why God does not choose them is to magnify his justice, and not because the sinner does something to reprobate themselves.  Those who are numbered among the reprobate were already dead and sin and under the just condemnation of God.  They are deserving of whatever judgment God determines will be meted out upon them.  They are reprobated by God, because he decrees not to deliver them from their fallen condition.  They are punished because of their participation in Adam’s sin, and for their actual sins. Those whom God determines not to choose,  receive divine justice–which they deserve–not mercy, which ultimately stems from God’s gracious nature and mysterious purposes.

The authors of the Canons respond to this Arminian error by simply citing the biblical text which speak to this: “He has mercy on whom he wishes, and he hardens whom he wishes (Rom. 9:18). And also: To you it has been given to know the secrets of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been given (Matt. 13:11). Likewise: I give glory to you, Father, Lord of heaven and earth, that you have hidden these things from the wise and understanding, and have revealed them to little children; yes, Father, because that was your pleasure (Matt. 11:25-26).”

Wednesday
Jun042008

A Return to Types and Shadows in the Millennial Age? -- A Problem for Dispensationalists

Third%20Temple.jpgIs the Millennium Characterized by a Return to Old Testament Types and Shadows?  The Problem with the Dispensational Interpretation of the Millennium

Dispensationists must not only face the problem of evil and apostasy during the millennial age associated with all forms of premillennialism, but as a distinct theological system in its own right with a distinct hermeneutic, dispensationalists also face a number of additional problems created by dispensational modifications of traditional premillennialism (
Click here: Riddleblog - The Latest Post - A Huge Problem for Premillennarians -- The Presence of Evil in the Millennial Age).

The problem with the dispensational interpretation of the millennium has to do with how we are to understand the general flow of redemptive history.  Throughout the Old Testament, Israel’s prophets foretell of the coming messianic age in terms of that prophet’s own particular time and place in the unfolding drama of redemptive history.  What is especially germane to our present question is the fact that Israel’s prophets speak of the glorious messianic age yet to come in terms of the types and shadows associated with Old Testament messianic anticipation.  

But Old Testament types and shadows are subsequently reinterpreted in the New Testament in the greater light of the dawn of the messianic age associated with Christ’s coming.  This is why one of the major aspects of the eschatology of the New Testament era is that what was promised in the Old Testament has been fulfilled in Jesus Christ.  The redemptive-historical pattern clearly moves from type and shadow to fulfillment and reality.  Because this is the case, the New Testament writers anticipate the final consummation at our Lord’s return and not a return to an earthly rule of Jesus Christ understood in terms of Old Testament types and shadows which were destined to pass away.

For example, when Israel’s prophets speak of the restoration of Israel, the New Testament contends that this promise of restoration is fulfilled in Jesus Christ, the true Israel (
Click here: Riddleblog - The Latest Post - Amillennialism 101 -- Jesus Christ: The True Israel).  When Israel’s prophets speak of the land of Canaan, the city of Jerusalem and the mountain of the Lord, the authors of the New Testament, in turn, point out that these themes are fulfilled in Christ and his church.  In many instances, they do so as a polemic against Jews who did not accept Jesus as Israel’s Messiah, sent by God to redeem his people from their sins.  The literal interpretation of these Old Testament messianic passages is supplied by the New Testament.  Therefore, Old Testament prophetic expectation must not be the basis for understanding the eschatology of the New.  

In order to understand the biblical teaching about the millennium, we must determine how the various authors of the New Testament apply messianic typology to Jesus Christ, and how, in turn, Jesus Christ fulfills the Old Testament messianic expectation, thereby guaranteeing his Second Advent and the final consummation.

What is especially problematic about the dispensational understanding of the millennial age is that the millennium as conceived by dispensationalists amounts to a return to the types and shadows associated with the Old Testament prophets and the typological understanding of the messianic age which has now been realized in Jesus Christ.  Once Christ has come and fulfilled these particular prophetic expectations, how can the dispensationalist justify his belief that the future millennial age is characterized by a redemptive economy of type and shadow, when the reality to which these things pointed, has already come?  This pre-messianic Old Testament millennial expectation, complete with restored temple worship and the reinstitution of animal sacrifices, can only be justified by a redemptive historical U-turn (
Click here: Riddleblog - The Latest Post - Jesus, the True Temple).  

According to dispensationalists, type and shadow are fulfilled in Jesus Christ who, in the millennial age, supposedly re-institutes these same types and shadows which are inferior and have passed away.  This is highly problematic and does great violence to the overall thrust of biblical history.  This peculiar feature of dispensationalism explains the rise of progressive dispensationalism, which seeks to avoid this highly-problematic aspect of traditional dispensationalism.

This supposed return to type and shadow during the millennial age is seen in the dispensational interpretation of the Abrahamic and Davidic covenants.  When dispensationalists contend that the land promise of the Abrahamic covenant is not fulfilled until Israel is reborn as a nation and returned to her ancient homeland in Palestine in 1948, they run head-long into Paul’s assertion that the Abrahamic covenant has been fulfilled in Jesus Christ, since even Gentiles who embrace the messianic promise through faith are Abraham’s children and members of this covenant (Galatians 3:15-29; Romans 4:1-25).  It is Paul who “spiritualizes” the promise of a land in Palestine which originally extended from the river of Egypt to the Euphrates, (Genesis 15:18) to now include the whole world (Romans 4:13).

This same tendency to ignore the way in which the New Testament writers apply Old Testament messianic expectations to Christ can be seen in the dispensational insistence that Christ has not yet fulfilled the Davidic covenant of 2 Samuel 7 since, supposedly, this will not occur until the millennial age, when Jesus rules the earth from David’s throne in Jerusalem.  But the writers of the New Testament could not be any clearer when they teach that this prophecy was fulfilled at the time of our Lord’s resurrection and ascension, when God raised Christ from the dead and exalted him on high by seating him at his right hand in heaven.  This event, Peter says, fulfills God’s messianic promise to David that one of his own descendants would sit on his throne (Acts 2: 30-35).  In fact, it is because Jesus fulfilled this promise that Peter urges his fellow Jews in the temple that first Pentecost Sunday to “repent and be baptized.”

Finally, the dispensationalist interpretation of redemptive history hinges upon a distinctive reading of the great messianic prophecy in Daniel 9:24-27, which supposedly places the seventieth week of Daniel in the future.  As I have argued elsewhere, Daniel’s prophecy is gloriously fulfilled in Jesus Christ, who in his active and passive obedience has finished transgression, put an end to sin, atoned for wickedness, brought in everlasting righteousness, sealed up vision and prophecy and anointed the most Holy place (v. 24).  Since Messiah was cut-off in the middle of the seventieth week and has made a covenant with his people (vv. 26-27), the seventy weeks prophecy has been fulfilled by Jesus Christ at the time of his first advent.  Therefore, there is no future seven-year tribulation period as taught by dispensationalists, nor does the Bible anticipate a peace treaty to be made between the Antichrist and the nation of Israel.  These are both essential features of the dispensationalist’s expectation for the future (
Click here: Riddleblog - The Latest Post - Eschatology Q & A -- What About the Remaining 3 1/2 Years in Daniel's Prophecy of t).

Because of these factors, amillennarians believe that the dispensational understanding of  redemptive history in general and of the millennial age in particular is seriously flawed.  The millennial age is not depicted in the Bible as a return to the types and shadows of the Old Testament, complete with temple worship and animal sacrifice, while Jesus rules the earth from David’s throne in Jerusalem.  Instead, the biblical data demonstrates that the millennium is this present age, where Jesus Christ rules the earth from heaven, and where his saints who do not worship the beast or his image, triumph in death, when they come to life and reign with Christ for a thousand years.  The millennial reign of Christ is a present reality.

This is an edited excerpt  from my book, A Case for Amillennialism.  For more information,  Click here: Riddleblog - A Case for Amillennialism - Understanding the End
 

Tuesday
Jun032008

The Scoop on the Poem "Footprints" and Other Stuff from Around the Web

links5.bmpIn the fundamentalist churches of my youth, so-called "blue laws" were the norm.  Since we were dispensationalists, we were taught that the law (the ten commandments)  was for a different dispensation.  Now, we were under the law of Christ.  Of course, that meant no smoking, no consuming adult beverages, etc.  While "blue laws" are often tied to American fundamentalism, seems the theological left have a few "blue laws" of their own.    For starters, how about ignoring climate change?   Click here: FOXNews.com - U.K. Bishop Compares Those Who Ignore Climate Change to Austrian 'Horror Dad' - International News

In the "what are Muslims mad about now?" department, two American preachers are in trouble in the UK for committing a "hate crime" by daring to enter the "no-go" area in Birmingham.  Seems Muslims have set up their own "safe" areas and won't allow outsiders (i.e, Christians) in.  Why are Muslims so afraid of the gospel?  Click here: Police advise Christian preachers to leave Muslim area of Birmingham - Telegraph

This is ironic.  Back in the day when I owned a Christian bookstore, we sold a million of these (Yes, I have repented).  I'll bet every grandma and aunt in America has the poem "footprints in the sand" on something from a decoupaged wall-plaque to a coffee mug.  Seems like the poem wasn't so "anonymous" after all.   The son of the supposed author is suing for all royalties, because mom told him that she wrote it.  The reason why there is only one set of footprints?  The other person walking along the beach has been hauled off to court!  Click here: Search to Divine Authorship Leads
'Footprints' to Court - washingtonpost.com

Seems we continually reach now lows in nanny-state stupidity.  Now college graduates can't throw their mortar-boards in the air because "they might hurt somebody."   Click here: A University has asked students not to throw their graduate hats in the air in case of injury | The Sun |HomePage|

Tuesday
Jun032008

"It Is Not as Though God's Word Has Falied" -- Romans 9:1-6

romans%20fragment.jpgThe Twenty-Fourth in a Series of Sermons on Paul's Epistle to the Romans

One of the major problems facing the apostle Paul was the thorny relationship between Jew and Gentile in those churches rapidly springing up throughout the cities of the Roman empire.  Those Jews who came to believe that Jesus was Israel’s promised Messiah often-times expected Gentile converts to live as Jews.  Many felt that Gentiles must submit to circumcision, keep the dietary laws and obey the Law of Moses in order to maintain a right-standing before God.  Gentile converts, on the other hand, knew nothing of the Old Testament before coming to faith in Jesus Christ.  Their question was simply, “who is Moses?”  No doubt, the Gentiles had trouble understanding why Jews wouldn’t eat certain foods and why circumcision was such a big deal.  Therefore, at some point in his letter to the church in Rome, Paul must explain the respective roles of Jew and Gentile in redemptive history.  Now that Christ has come and fulfilled the Old Testament promises of redemption, Paul must explain Israel’s place in God’s future purposes.

The role of Romans 9-11 in Paul’s letter to the church in Rome is the subject of much debate in contemporary biblical scholarship.  The problem is this.  Is this section of Romans an excursus–a  personal detour in which Paul expresses his personal anguish about his people, the Jews–or is this section an essential part of the overall theological argument of the epistle?  According to Charles Cranfield, “a superficial reading of the epistle might easily leave one with the impression that chapters 9-11 are simply an excursus which Paul has included under the pressure of his own deep personal involvement in the matter of Israel’s destiny but which is without any real inner relatedness to the main argument of Romans.  But a closer study reveals the fact that there are very many features of chapters 1 to 8 which are not understood in full depth until they are seen in the light of chapters 9-11.”  If true, this means that “these chapters may be seen to be in integral part of the working out of the theme of this epistle.”

What are these features which are not fully understood until we come to this section?  In Romans 1:16-17, in which Paul sets out the thesis statement of this letter–through the preaching of the gospel, which is the power of God unto salvation, a righteousness from God is revealed–Paul made the point that the gospel which he preaches is the gospel concerning God’s son, Jesus Christ, who, according to the flesh was an ancestor of David, Israel’s greatest king (cf. Romans 1:1-4).  Given the fact that Jesus is the Christ (Israel’s promised Messiah), at some point in this letter, Paul must explain how the gospel he preaches relates to God’s people, Israel, since the content of that gospel–the person and work of Jesus Christ–can only be properly understood as the fulfillment of that redemption from sin promised in throughout the Old Testament in which David’s ancestor was prophesied to play a major role.

To read the rest of this sermon, click here 

Monday
Jun022008

Sermons on Judges

Samson.bmpHere are the final two sermons in my recent series on the Book of Judges

Judges 17-18:  "Everyone Did What Was Right in His Own Eyes"

http://links.christreformed.org/realaudio
/KR20080525-Judges.mp3

 Judges 19-21, "All the Men of Israel Drew the Sword"

http://links.christreformed.org/realaudio
/KR20080601-Judges.mp3

Monday
Jun022008

Who Said That?

question%20mark.jpg

"These two versions of Jesus--the sketchy historical figure and the abstract theological creation--hold a tragic aspect for me, because I blame them for stealing something precious: the Jesus who taught his followers how to reach God-consciousness. I want to offer the possibility that Jesus was truly, as he proclaimed, a savior. Not the savior, not the one and only Son of God. Rather, Jesus embodied the highest level of enlightenment. He spent his brief adult life describing it, teaching it, and passing it on to future generations. Jesus intended to save the world by showing others the path to God-consciousness."

Who said that?  Please, no google searches please.  Leave your guess in the comments section below. 

Saturday
May312008

Scott Clark's New Moniker and Other Interesting Things From Around the Web

Links.jpgThere's a good reason why Scott Clark is stenciling "Maverick" on everything he owns.  This is too cool and yes, I am very jealous.  Way to go Scott!   Click here: Two Landings and One Ground Strike « Heidelblog

Here's another misguided guilt trip to get us to exercise more.  This is also a good reason why context and the law-gospel distinction will save us from the tyranny of exercise nannies and the food police.    Click here: Bible guides some in fitness routines - USATODAY.com

Since deep down inside Muslims know that the cross always trumps the crescent, the only way to stop the spread of the gospel is to arrest new converts to Christianity.  Of course, what they don't know is that Christianity always spreads faster when government authorities try to stamp it out.  Hint to Muslim authorities--the way to stop the spread of the gospel is to encourage these new Christians to adopt church growth techniques.  That will do it every time. Click here: FOXNews.com - Report: Iran Arrests Suspected Converts to Christianity - International News | News of the World | M

OK, these "top hundred lists" are always flawed.  But any list of the top 100 guitar songs which includes the Allman Brother's "Statesboro Blues," Jimi Hendrix's "Machine Gun,  the Stones' "Can't You Hear Me Knocking?"  can't be all wrong.  But how did Prince make this list?  And where is Deep Purple's "Smoke on the Water" and "Speed King"?  Click here: The 100 Greatest Guitar Songs of All Time : Rolling Stone

Thursday
May292008

The Canons of Dort, First Head of Doctrine, Rejection of Errors, Paragraph Seven

Synod%20of%20Dort.jpgSynod condemns those . . .

VII  Who teach that in this life there is no fruit, no awareness, and no assurance of one's unchangeable election to glory, except as conditional upon something changeable and contingent.

For not only is it absurd to speak of an uncertain assurance, but these things also militate against the experience of the saints, who with the apostle rejoice from an awareness of their election and sing the praises of this gift of God; who, as Christ urged, rejoice with his disciples that their names have been written in heaven (Luke 10:20); and finally who hold up against the flaming arrows of the devil's temptations the awareness of their election, with the question Who will bring any charge against those whom God has chosen? (Rom. 8:33).

____________________________________

Like Roman Catholic theology, which argues that any notion of the assurance of salvation inevitably leads to presumption and laxity in the Christian life (the sin of presumption), so too, Arminians have argued that the ground of election is to be located in a Christian’s personal performance (faith and good works). 

According to the Canons and Decrees of the Council of Trent, “No one...so long as he lives this mortal life, ought to regard to the sacred mystery of divine predestination, so far presume as to state with absolute certainty, that he is numbered of the predestined, as if it were true that the one justified either cannot sin any more, or, if he does sin, that he ought to promise himself an assured repentance.  For except by special revelation, it cannot be known who God has chosen to Himself.” (Sixth Session, Chapter XII).  As Rome sees the matter, no one can know that they are numbered among the elect.  This lack of assurance supposedly motivates the faithful to lead godly lives and to persevere in good works to the end of their lives, so that they may be saved.  In this scheme, the proper motivation for perseverance and good works is the fear of divine chastisement and/or eternal punishment.  Clearly,  Rome was afraid that believers who possessed assurance of their salvation would become morally lax, and live lives indifferent to good works and holy living.  

Some Arminians have taken a very similar position.  According to a work by Calvary Chapel pastor George Bryson, “by reducing perseverance to an inevitability all of the words of encouragement and warning are in a real sense wasted.  But in Scripture, perseverance in holiness to the end is seen as the challenge and the goal of the Christian life.  It should not be taken for granted.  To say that perseverance is what we will do because we are true believers is to radically redefine the meaning of perseverance.  Instead we need to see perseverance as what we ought to do because we are true believers.  God is more than able and willing to help us persevere in holiness and faith. The question is are we willing to let Him help us persevere?” (George Bryson, The Five Points of Calvinism, 113).  

For the Arminian, if the Christian believes, repents, and then lives a godly life unto the end, election is seen to be absolute and final.  The Arminian argues that this must be the case, or else Christians will mistakenly presume that they are of the elect, and will not live godly lives, nor seek God’s favor as they ought.  According to someone like Bryson, the Reformed view of election removes all incentive for both evangelism and good works. It was none other than John Wesley who argued that George Whitefield’s view of predestination (Reformed) was in error, since Whitefield’s Calvinism supposedly undermined the basis for the Christian life, which was, according to Wesley, fear of punishment and hope of reward.  It is with this in mind that t
he Arminians will challenge the Reformed to make sense of the warnings throughout the Scriptures for believers to persevere.

The Canons are quick to point out that the exact opposite state of affairs is taught us in Holy Scripture.  It is the believer’s assurance of salvation which serves as the basis for the good works we perform!  As the authors of the Canons put it:  “For not only is it absurd to speak of an uncertain assurance, but these things also militate against the experience of the saints, who with the apostle rejoice from an awareness of their election and sing the praises of this gift of God; who, as Christ urged, rejoice with his disciples that their names have been written in heaven (Luke 10:20); and finally who hold up against the flaming arrows of the devil's temptations the awareness of their election, with the question Who will bring any charge against those whom God has chosen? (Rom. 8:33).”  

This is also the clear teaching of John’s Gospel (John 15:1-16):

“I am the true vine, and my Father is the vinedresser. 2  Every branch in me that does not bear fruit he takes away, and every branch that does bear fruit he prunes, that it may bear more fruit. 3 Already you are clean because of the word that I have spoken to you. 4 Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit by itself, unless it abides in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide in me. 5 I am the vine; you are the branches. Whoever abides in me and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing. 6 If anyone does not abide in me he is thrown away like a branch and withers; and the branches are gathered, thrown into the fire, and burned. 7 If you abide in me, and my words abide in you, ask whatever you wish, and it will be done for you. 8 By this my Father is glorified, that you bear much fruit and so prove to be my disciples. 9 As the Father has loved me, so have I loved you. Abide in my love. 10 If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love, just as I have kept my Father's commandments and abide in his love. 11 These things I have spoken to you, that my joy may be in you, and that your joy may be full. 12 “This is my commandment, that you love one another as I have loved you. 13 Greater love has no one than this, that someone lay down his life for his friends. 14 You are my friends if you do what I command you. 15 No longer do I call you servants, for the servant does not know what his master is doing; but I have called you friends, for all that I have heard from my Father I have made known to you. 16 You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you that you should go and bear fruit and that your fruit should abide, so that whatever you ask the Father in my name, he may give it to you.”

According to Jesus, the elect are chosen for the purpose of bearing fruit, not the other way around!

People who live in fear of God are not energized to do good works.  Instead, they are paralyzed!  They live and act in fear.  Since they are never sure of God’s favor toward them, any works they perform are based upon fear, and do come not from the  gratitude arising from true faith.  Even worse, such works are often performed in an attempt to leverage favor from God.  As sinners, we all want more crowns and a bigger mansion!  Often times people laboring under the Roman-Arminian misconception, may even end up doing their works with the goal of being saved in the end.  Tragically, this leads to the real matter of presumption here, namely someone who believes that their "good" works will actually save them!   Now that is the height of presumption!  

It is only a Christian, who has the certain hope of heaven, who is truly free to obey the commandments of God!  The Reformed have always argued that the warnings in Scripture are indeed valid, and the elect heed these warnings!  The elect hear the shepherd’s voice!  They believe the gospel.  They flee to Christ when they fall into sin or struggle with doubt. 

It must also be said that the Bible knows nothing of a person numbered among the elect, who will not be justified, and sanctified, before reaching glorification.  At some point, the elect will indeed come to faith and be justified.  And through the same act of faith which justifies, the life-time process of sanctification immediately begins.   God begins the work (election).  God sustains his work in time and space (faith and its fruits, repentance and good works).  God sees it through to the end (perserverence)!  Indeed, believers persevere not because we are strong enough, but because God is strong enough! We persevere, not because of our faith, but because of God’s faithfulness.  We persevere not to be numbered among the elect, but because we are already numbered among the elect.

Tragically, it is Romanism and Arminianism which lead to a life of fear and doubt, not faith and a life of gratitude.  As the author to the Hebrews proclaims, “without faith, it is impossible to please God.”  Through faith in Christ, we are covered by the perfect righteousness of Jesus Christ himself, and therefore every work which we perform--no matter how selfish or tainted by sin that work may be--is pleasing to God.  Why?  Because God cannot turn aside the righteousness of his Son in which we are clothed!

Thursday
May292008

The "Issues, Etc." Crew Is Coming Back to Radio!

Issues%20Etc.gifFormer "Issues, Etc.," host Rev. Todd Wilken (along with his producer, Jeff Schwarz) will be back on Christian radio soon with a new daily broadcast.  For more information, Click here: A New Issues Etc. is Arising!

The program will be totally independent, and free (blessedly so) from control of the LCMS "ABlaze" types.  It will also be listener supported.  This means you'll get confessional Lutheran theology along with Todd's sharp analysis of contemporary issues.  As a Reformed guy, I can live with that!

Great to see this come about!  Welcome back to Todd and Jeff!  We missed you! 

Wednesday
May282008

A Huge Problem for Premillennarians -- The Presence of Evil in the Millennial Age

Lion%20and%20Lamb.bmp

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Evil in the Millennium?  A Huge Problem for Premillennialism

No doubt, one of great strengths of premillennialism is its apparently straightforward reading of Revelation 19 and 20.  If John depicts the Second Advent of Christ in Revelation 19, and in Revelation 20 he describes the millennial reign of Christ which follows, this would seem to establish some form of premillennialism.  On the face of things, this appears to be a formidable argument in favor of premillennialism. 

Therefore, when amillennarians attempt to challenge this point by contending that Revelation 20 is part of a different vision which recapitulates the events depicted in Revelation 19, we run headlong into the premillennial argument that amillennarians “spiritualize the Bible.”  Supposedly, we don’t take John seriously when he speaks of a “literal” thousand years and a bodily resurrection (the “first” resurrection) associated with the second coming of Jesus Christ. 

A “literal” reading of the text will make far more sense to Christians who are rightly suspicious of those who twist the biblical text to suit their own ends.  A complicated argument for reading apocalyptic literature in what appears to be a non-literal way faces an uphill battle from the start.  Thus it is easy for premillennarians to dismiss amillennialism as a viable alternative because it, apparently, does not comport with the plain sense of the critical millennial passage.

But the problem with premillennialism is that this particular interpretation, if true, creates far more serious theological problems than it solves, problems which are far too often overlooked by premillennarians.  Suppose for the sake of argument, we grant that the premillennial understanding of the millennial age is the biblical one.  What are the consequences of the premillennial interpretation of Revelation 20:1-10?

If premillennialism is true, this means that Jesus Christ returns to judge the world in Revelation 19 and that in Revelation 20 John is describing Christ’s future millennial reign.  But what happens at the end of Christ’s millennial rule over the earth?  According to Revelation 20:7-10, Satan is released from the abyss and immediately goes out to the four corners of the earth to deceive the nations (those same nations which have already been judged according to Revelation 19:15).  Satan organizes them for battle against the camp of God’s people and the city that he loves–i.e., Jerusalem.  This revolt ends when fire comes down from heaven and consumes the rebels along with the devil who deceived them. 

But the nagging question remains.  “Who are these people who are deceived by Satan, who then revolt against God, only to be consumed by fire from heaven?”

According to premillennarians, one group of people on the earth during the millennial age are the redeemed.  No one believes that it is possible for such people who have been raised from the dead when Christ comes back, and who are now glorified, to participate in a revolt like the one depicted in Revelation 20.  Therefore, those who revolt during the millennium must be individuals who have not yet been raised from the dead or who have not gone through the judgment when Christ returned to earth when the millennial age began.  Dispensationalists believe that these are individuals who come to faith after the Rapture and survive the great tribulation and wrath of the Antichrist, while historic premillennarians believe that these are people living at the time of our Lord’s return who are not raised from the dead or judged, and who subsequently repopulate the earth during the millennial age.

But this conception of the millennial age is highly problematic despite the apparent “literal” reading of Revelation 20.  According to premillennarians, the millennium is a period in redemptive history in which people who have been raised from the dead and who now live upon the earth in resurrected bodies co-exist with people who have not been raised from the dead and who remain in the flesh.  How can this be?  Where is this mixture of resurrected and unresurrected individuals taught, or even implied in the Scriptures?  As we have seen, the New Testament writers all anticipate the final consummation to occur at the time of our Lord’s Second Advent.  They do not anticipate the half-way step of an earthly millennium before the final consummation such as that associated with all forms of premillennalism.  

Perhaps even more problematic is the following dilemma raised by the premillennial insistence upon people in natural bodies living on the earth alongside of Christ and his resurrected saints.  How do people living on the earth at the time of Christ’s second coming escape the resurrection and the judgment?  The Scriptures are very clear that Christ returns to judge the world, raise the dead and renew the cosmos.  According to Paul in 1 Thessalonians 4:15-17, those who have died in Christ are raised from the dead at his coming.  Those who are Christ’s and who are still alive when he comes are caught up to meet the Lord in the air.  This includes all believers, whether living or dead.  But those who are not Christ’s, we are told, will face his wrath and will be taken away to face final judgment (Matthew 24:37-41).  This includes all unbelievers living at the time of our Lord’s return.  Therefore, premillennarians must explain just who, exactly, are these people in unresurrected bodies living during the millennium.  How do we account for people who are not judged or raised from the dead at the time of our Lord’s Second Advent?  This is especially problematic since Jesus himself clearly teaches that in the age to come his people will all be children of the resurrection (Luke 20:34-38).  Furthermore, Paul states that “Flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God” (1 Corinthians 15:50).  The temporal has passed away, hence the impossibility of people in natural bodies repopulating the earth, after the second coming.

Because of the problem of evil and apostasy during the millennial age, premillennarians must attempt to deal with this problem by contending that the final judgment does not take place until after the thousand years have passed.  In passages such as Matthew 25:31-46, where it is explicitly taught that the final judgment occurs when our Lord returns, premillennarians instead argue that there is a gap of one thousand years between our Lord’s return and the final judgment.  But recall that premillennarians often insist that they are so, precisely because of the literal interpretation of the Scriptures and a reluctance to “spiritualize” prophetic portions of Scripture.  So now we must ask our premillennial friends the obvious question, “where is the one thousand year gap between Christ’s return and the final judgment taught in the Scriptures?”  It is not there.  The gap must be inserted even though doing so violates the plain sense of the passage and the self-professed premillennial insistence upon a literal interpretation.

Therefore, the apparent strength of premillennialism is actually its biggest weakness.  If premillennarians are correct about their reading of Revelation 20, the millennial age will be one in which Jesus rules upon the earth over people in resurrected and unresurrected bodies.  Our Lord’s millennial rule will end with a massive Satanic deception of the nations and a revolt against Christ and his church after they have reigned upon the earth for a thousand years.  If true, this millennial apostasy is tantamount to a second fall and not even resurrected and glorified saints are safe from the future wrath of Satan and the unbelieving nations.  Although at first glance premillennarians may appear to have the plain sense of the passage on their side, the consequences of the premillennial interpretation cannot be easily dismissed.

Therefore, a second glance at the passage is in order, especially given the nature of apocalyptic literature.  The scene in Revelation 20 is indeed a recapitulation of Revelation 19 and as such, constitutes a new vision distinct from that in Revelation 19.  The language of Revelation 20 is highly symbolic, depicting not a future state of affairs, but the present victory of Christ, who ensures that his people come to life and reign with him in heaven, despite the persecution and martyrdom faced by the faithful on the earth.  Elsewhere, the New Testament clearly speaks of a coming apostasy at the end of the age (2 Thessalonians 2:1-12), and the same event is likely depicted by John from a different perspective in Revelation 20:7-10.

The interpretive choice is obvious:  either we take John’s depiction of the millennium to be a description of the present reign of Christ and the triumph of God’s people over those who seek to destroy them (amillennialism), or else we must see Revelation 20 as depicting a millennial age after Christ’s return in which people co-exist in resurrected and unresurrected bodies and which ends in a Satanically-energized apostasy, interrupted by fire from heaven consuming those rebellious apostates who have lived under Christ’s earthly rule only to fall victim to Satanic deception (premillennialism).  The presence of evil and the mixing of redeemed and unredeemed individuals living together on earth during the millennial age makes the premillennial interpretation highly untenable--a point premillennarians too often ignore.

This is an edited excerpt  from my book, A Case for Amillennialism.  For more information,  Click here: Riddleblog - A Case for Amillennialism - Understanding the End