Social Network Links
Powered by Squarespace
Search the Riddleblog
"Amillennialism 101" -- Audio and On-Line Resources

 

Living in Light of Two Ages

____________________________

Entries in A Riddlebarger Rant (61)

Monday
Jul062009

What Can I Do? Two Options for Non-Partisan Political Activism

People ask me questions--most often about eschatology--because I solicit such questions.

But since the 2008 presidential election, things have changed. While President Obama remains personally popular, polls show his policies (as well as those of the democrat congress) are not.  The economy has not turned around and shows no signs of doing so.  In fact, one more unforeseen crisis--like an oil shortage caused by some interruption in supply--would surely push us into deep recession (if we are not already there).

In my circle, layoffs have hit hard and many people are struggling to make ends meet.  And since most Christians (even Reformed Christians) tend to be social and economic conservatives, more and more people believe that America is now well along the path to socialism.  People are worried.  Rightly so.  And they come to me with questions.  And I'm not much help.

As a pastor committed to a two-kingdom theology, I make every effort to keep my political opinions to myself.  My close friends, who know and understand how I view the two kingdoms, have heard my political rants.  But many who don't know me as well assume that my reticence to speak about partisan politics in public means I don't have strong political views--or that my views tend left.  Whatever.  I will tell you that I've come to despise partisan politics and am saddened that far too many people whom I love and respect vote to elect people to office about on the same basis that they vote for their favorite on "American Idol."  "I really like them."  "They gave such a good speech."  "They care about me."  "They'll bring about change"   In other words, people naively believe all those political sound-bites designed to create precisely this reaction.

My calling as a pastor demands that I not confuse my personal politics with preaching the law and gospel to all political partisans. I take that calling very seriously. Yet I do feel some sense of obligation to answer honest questions, even if those questions go to the political . . .

So, here are two things I urge all my readers to consider. These are non-partisan, but get to the heart of what is wrong with the American political process as it currently functions.

First, support Ron Paul's HRES 216 IH. OK, I realize that the mere mention of Ron Paul's name will send some of you over the edge--but read this first, and then react.  This procedural resolution simply calls for any bill coming up for a vote to be published (on-line) for ten days before the vote can take place in the Congress.  This gives both the public and the members of Congress time to actually read and debate all proposed legislation before Congress votes on said legisltation.  Paul's resolution is but one paragraph long.  Read it!  Click here: Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)

The House of Representatives just passed one of the most far-reaching bills in American history (the so-called "Cap and Trade"), and that bill had not yet even been finalized when it was voted upon!  Not to mention a 300 page amendment was submitted at 3:00 AM on the day of the vote.  In other words, this monumental bill was passed by members of our Congress who had not even read it!  This is irresponsible in the extreme.

What can you do?  Ask your congress person to support this resolution.  Don't vote for them again if they don't.  Call, or email their office and ask where they stand on this.  In my mind, members of Congress who vote for legislation they have not read disqualify themselves from holding future office.

Second, repealing the seventeenth amendment would knock the legs out from under the pompous partisan hacks we know as a "US Senator."  The US Constitution, as written, assumed that the states would each send two state legislators to Washington to represent the interests of their state before the US Senate.  The senators represented the states which sent them (primarily), not their respective political parties which now control them.

The seveneenth amendment called for the direct election of senators, and this created a year-round resident of the Washington beltway, who now does the business of his or her political party, not their respective states.

Here's blog devoted to the repeal of the seventeenth amendment (it is a mixed bag--Click here: Repeal the 17th Amendment).  Here's a great FAQ explaining why the seventeenth amendment was passed and what the ramifications would be if it was repealed.  Click here: Why Repeal 17th Amendment?

What can you do?  Talk this up.  Whenever the subject of the behavior of our Senate comes up in a discussion, raise repealing the seventeenth amendment as an option.  If repealing this amendment ever catches on in the popular imagination, the sheer terror of what this might do to the pompous political hacks living in the Beltway, might bring about more responsible behavior.

In any case, the seventeenth amendment has brought about distarous consequences and needs to be repealed.  Start the ball rolling by talking about this whenever you can!

Thursday
Jun182009

One Reason Why I'd Like to See the Seventeenth Amendment Repealed

Aside from my personal opinions about Senator Barbara Boxer (now known as Ma'am), there is a point behind this post.  The video speaks for itself.  How does this woman get re-elected over and over again?

As for my point . . .  US Senators were supposed to represent the interests of their state in all business regarding the federal government.  The members of the House of Representatives were to represent the interests of the citizens within their various districts before the federal government. 

But once the seventeenth amendment was ratified in 1913, US Senators were effectively removed from their state legislatures, now to reside full-time in DC.  In practice, US Senators no longer represent their states, but their political parties.  This re-structuring of the constitution has helped to create the kind of pomposity we see coming from Ma'am Boxer in this video.  Senators no longer see themselves as public servants, but as an elite governing class, above the rabble . . .  Sadly, this kind of condescending attitude coming from Ma'am Boxer toward a decorated brigadier general, is typical of virtually all senators from either party.  

One way to put an end to this would be to return these people to their state legislatures (for six months of the year) and force them to represent the interest of their states, not their political parties.  If you want a smaller, more responsive federal government, one place to start is with the repeal of the seventeenth amendment! 

Tuesday
Jun022009

Never Thought I'd Post Something from Pravda . . .

Pravda often publishes essays on the decline of America.  But this one is really amazing.  I'll leave the comments about the decline of capitalism "without a whimper" to you to read if you wish (Click here: American capitalism gone with a whimper - Pravda.Ru)

But this point about American Christianity really caught my attention:

"Then their faith in God was destroyed, until their churches, all tens of thousands of different `branches and denominations' were for the most part little more then Sunday circuses and their televangelists and top protestant mega preachers were more then happy to sell out their souls and flocks to be on the `winning' side of one pseudo Marxist politician or another.  Their flocks may complain, but when explained that they would be on the `winning' side, their flocks were ever so quick to reject Christ in hopes for earthly power."

Wow . . .

Wednesday
May202009

Chrysler, Chevrolet, and the Fifth Amendment

I'm not a constitutional scholar. I don't even play one on radio. Despite the fact I was educated in California's public schools, I do recall this line from the closing section of the Fifth Amendment--"nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation."

So, when the Obama administration decrees (as a part of the government take-over of GM and Chrysler) that a certain number of Chrysler and Chevrolet dealers (which are privately owned, with personal inventory, debt, and employees) must close (without any compensation, or purchase of their inventories or properties) simply because someone in DC tells them they must, we have crossed a very dangerous line.

Many a family business and fortune will be wiped out.  Not to mention the large number of those employed by these dealers who will likewise be unemployed and now forced to exist on government largess.

For all intents and purposes, how is this not government seizure of private property?

This is one lawsuit I will watch very closely.  Click here: http://www.freep.com/article/20090518/BUSINESS01/90518004/1014/Chrysler+dealers+prepare+legal+fight

The DC Caesars need their collective private property-grabbing noses bloodied on this one!  How is this not a violation of the Fifth Amendment?

Monday
Apr132009

Tony Blair Has a Few Things to Learn About Roman Catholicism

A "pro-gay" pope? I don't think so. Not in my lifetime, anyway.

Tony Blair is a recent convert to Romanism.  Therefore, it might take him a while to realize that Rome doesn't have the same pragmatic, ethical categories favored by politicians.

So, Blair has noticed the liberal-minded attitude of many Catholics about homosexuality--and he's probably correct in his assessment.  He then mistakenly assumes that this is a problem of church unity because the rank and file catholics are more open to gay unions than are church officials. Click here: BBC NEWS | UK | UK Politics | Blair questions Papal gay policy

Blair naively seems to think that the problem is the "entrenched attitudes of church leaders" who (it is implied) will eventually moderate over time.  But the infallible church you have now joined, Mr. Blair, doesn't get these things wrong.  And those crusty, well-entrenched Cardinals are not particularly interested in what a former PM might think about anything. 

Better get used to it, Mr. Blair.  You'll be kissing the pope's ring.  He sure won't be kissing yours.

Monday
Feb162009

Another Reason Why I Am Not a Francophile

According to a survey in Classic & Sports Car magazine, the Citroen DS was voted "the most beautiful car" of all time.

There is no way that the Citroen DS is the most beautiful car of all time!  The ugliest, maybe . . .  What about the Jaguar XKE, or the Mercedes-Benz SL300 Gull-Wing?  These autos are works of art.

And besides, the Citroen is French. The voters in this poll must have been as well.

Here's the link to the poll. Click here: Citroen DS Named Most Beautiful Car Ever - Automotive News Story - WBAL Baltimore

Tuesday
Feb102009

Is the LCMS Threatening "Issues, Etc." with a Lawsuit?

Just got this with a request for immediate posting.  It is from Chris Rosebrough's Extreme Theology blog.  Here's the link (Click here: Extreme Theology: Kieschnick Threatening Lawsuit Agaist Todd Wilken and Jeff Schwarz).

According to Chris:

"Last march the LCMS cancelled the Issues, Etc. radio program. It created a huge brouhaha and ultimately the Issues, Etc. radio program was resurrected and their audience is larger and stronger than ever.

Apparently, this isn't sitting well with LCMS President Gerry Kieschnick who is now threatening a lawsuit against Todd Wilken and Jeff Schwarz over the Issues, Etc. trademark (a trademark that the LCMS abandoned in 1999 and a trademark that the LCMS has no intention of ever utilizing again)

What is the real reason why Kieschnick wants to sue Todd and Jeff? He wants to silence them."

Don't you just love church bureaucrats?  I wonder how Ablaze is working, and if its "growing" the church?

Tuesday
Feb102009

Well, That Settles It, I'm Changing My Sermon . . .

FCC commissioner Jonathan S. Adelstein is asking churches to help inform their congregations about the up coming switch in TV broadcasts from analog to digital.  Not only did these knuckleheads switch the date of the transition after all those stupid public service ads--originally scheduled for Feb. 17 to June 12--they did so because Congress wanted more money in the "spendulous bill" for additional converter boxes.  Click here: L.A. ministers asked to spread the word about digital TV - Los Angeles Times

Now, how am I going to fit--"did you know that your TV won't be able to pick up digital programming if use don't have cable or get a converter box?"--into a sermon on 1 John 4:1-6?

Interesting how government bureaucrats see the church as some sort of community center.  I wonder how the FCC commissioner ever got that idea?

Thursday
Jan152009

An Ironclad Case for the Necessity of Church Discipline

It has been said that a picture is worth a thousand words.  And, to be frank, this picture troubled me so much I am reluctant to post it.  But here is Episcopal Bishop Gene Robinson pictured in his full ecclesial regalia with his "life partner," Mark Andrew.

My reluctance aside, the picture speaks volumes to the question of church discipline and what happens when a church becomes so apostate that its leaders actually relish in the very sinful behavior that they been charged with confronting (both theologically and pastorally).

This is why we believe that discipline is a mark of a true church, and this is the sad and tragic end of that dreaded "slippery slope."

 

Friday
Jan022009

Fix the BCS!

As if we needed more proof that we live in a fallen world, how on earth can the BCS title game not include USC? 

Pete Carroll's Trojans spanked a very good Penn State team from beginning to end.  Despite all the talk about the weakness of West Coast football, the Pac-Ten team won each one of their bowl games.  Oklahoma against Florida?  Give me a break!  It should be USC against the Gators, plain and simple!

Looks like more and more folks are getting onboard with the "BCS plus one" proposal.  All the major bowl games would be played again on New Years' Eve or Day--rather than scattering them all over the place.  These five bowl games (all the traditional ones) would feature the six major conference winners, plus four wildcard teams.  Then, the next week there would be a single game playoff between the two teams that had the highest computer rankings from the bowl games the week before.  Now that makes sense . . . 

But since this makes so much sense, it will probably never come to pass.  I'm certain that in order to be one of NCAA officials who decides such things, you must first have been a member of Congress.

Page 1 ... 2 3 4 5 6 ... 7 Next 10 Entries »